2016
DOI: 10.1111/brv.12256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oceanic island biogeography through the lens of the general dynamic model: assessment and prospect

Abstract: The general dynamic model of oceanic island biogeography (GDM) has added a new dimension to theoretical island biogeography in recognizing that geological processes are key drivers of the evolutionary processes of diversification and extinction within remote islands. It provides a dynamic and essentially non-equilibrium framework generating novel predictions for emergent diversity properties of oceanic islands and archipelagos. Its publication in 2008 coincided with, and spurred on, renewed attention to the dy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
148
1
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(159 citation statements)
references
References 167 publications
(227 reference statements)
5
148
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These effects on speciation have been verbally formalized within the general dynamic model (GDM) of oceanic island biogeography, the distinguishing feature of which is to posit that diversity patterns within and across archipelagos are also influenced in a predictable fashion by the geodynamics of oceanic islands over their lifespan (Whittaker, Triantis, & Ladle, , ). The resulting biogeographical predictions have made the GDM a powerful framework for studying islands (reviewed in Borregaard et al, ). However, the GDM has not yet been thoroughly assessed by niche‐based, spatially and demographically explicit simulation models that focus on the processes occurring at the level of individuals and populations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These effects on speciation have been verbally formalized within the general dynamic model (GDM) of oceanic island biogeography, the distinguishing feature of which is to posit that diversity patterns within and across archipelagos are also influenced in a predictable fashion by the geodynamics of oceanic islands over their lifespan (Whittaker, Triantis, & Ladle, , ). The resulting biogeographical predictions have made the GDM a powerful framework for studying islands (reviewed in Borregaard et al, ). However, the GDM has not yet been thoroughly assessed by niche‐based, spatially and demographically explicit simulation models that focus on the processes occurring at the level of individuals and populations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While patterns of diversification in Macaronesia, mainly in terrestrial organisms, have been reviewed by Borregaard et al (), colonization and gene flow of marine benthic organisms have only been studied in those with a pelagic phase (Chevolot, Hoarau, Rijnsdorp, Stam, & Olsen, ; Sá‐Pinto, Branco, Sayanda, & Alexandrino, ; Xavier, van Soest, Breeuwer, Martins, & Menken, ). Marine benthic invertebrates that inhabit intertidal coastal areas are unique relative to both terrestrial organisms and other marine taxa (Hachich et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More connected islands should have higher immigration (dispersal) and higher species richness but lower endemism and phylogenesis (MacArthur & Wilson, ). In contrast, large islands exhibit higher endemism and in situ diversification driven by greater habitat complexity (Borregaard et al., ; Kisel & Barraclough, ; Losos & Schluter, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%