2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2019.05.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ocean quahogs (Arctica islandica) and Atlantic surfclams (Spisula solidissima) on the Mid-Atlantic Bight continental shelf and Georges Bank: The death assemblage as a recorder of climate change and the reorganization of the continental shelf benthos

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 160 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This cohabited ecotone is well described. recently documented this phenomenon on Georges Bank (see also Powell et al, 2019). The finding of smaller surfclams offshore in this survey east of Nantucket is consistent with the expectation of recent colonization in deeper water.…”
Section: Surfclam Range Shift Dynamicssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This cohabited ecotone is well described. recently documented this phenomenon on Georges Bank (see also Powell et al, 2019). The finding of smaller surfclams offshore in this survey east of Nantucket is consistent with the expectation of recent colonization in deeper water.…”
Section: Surfclam Range Shift Dynamicssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The interaction of species thrown together by climate change, transiently as ranges shift at differing rates, is little understood. The Atlantic surfclam and the ocean quahog co-occur over an extensive boundary as surfclams invade ocean quahog habitat (Powell et al, 2019). What interaction occurs remains unknown, but both species are routinely found together along the invasion front, indicating that competitive exclusion is not occurring, at least on a time scale amenable to survey monitoring.…”
Section: Transient Multiple Stable States-do They Exist?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CPB has the potential to provide data that are salient—relevant to the needs of decision makers and timely (Cash et al 2003)—through its unique long-term perspective (e.g., Jackson et al 2001; Volety et al 2009; Rick and Lockwood 2013; Wingard and Lorenz 2014; Dietl et al 2015; Durham and Dietl 2015; Smith et al 2018; Leonard-Pingel et al 2019; Powell et al 2020). To date, the contributions of marine CPB have mainly consisted of providing geohistorical baselines of past species’ composition and abundance in communities (Kowalewski et al 2000; Jackson et al 2001; Dietl and Flessa 2011, 2017; Louys et al 2012; Rick and Lockwood 2013; Dietl et al 2015; Tyler and Schneider 2018).…”
Section: Live–dead Studies In Marine Conservation Paleobiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the rapidly changing Anthropocene world, however, change is the new norm (Halpern et al 2008; Stein et al 2014). As species move in response to, and because of, human actions and multiple environmental stressors (e.g., Aronson et al 2007; Greenstein and Pandolfi 2008; Sunday et al 2012; Pinsky et al 2013; Smith and Dietl 2016; Morley et al 2018; Saupe et al 2019; Powell et al 2020), the underlying assumption of environmental (i.e., climatic) stability inherent to Kidwell's approach becomes increasingly untenable for establishing restoration targets (Wolkovich et al 2014; Corlett 2015; Kopf et al 2015).…”
Section: Live–dead Studies In Marine Conservation Paleobiologymentioning
confidence: 99%