Ocean prediction capabilities (Present and Future) at the naval research laboratory

Harding, J. M.; Preller, Ruth H.; Rhodes, Robert C.

doi:10.1109/oceans.2002.1192066

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This domain was similarly driven by a model of the entire North Pacific (NPac) at 40‐km resolution (full domain shown in Figure 1). Other similar nested modeling studies include those of Hermann et al [2002] and Harding et al [2002].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Results from a three‐dimensional, nested biological‐physical model of the California Current System and comparisons with statistics from satellite imagery

et al. 2006

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

[1] A three-dimensional model of the California Current System (CCS) from 35°N to 48°N extending offshore to 134°W is coupled with a four-component trophic model. The model reproduces many conspicuous characteristics in the CCS, including: complex, filamentary, mesoscale surface features seen in the pigment and temperature from satellite imagery; wind-driven coastal upwelling at appropriate spatial and temporal scales; and the close correlation between prominent features seen in pigment and those in temperature observed by satellites (Abbott and Zion, 1985). Statistical estimates of the characteristic spatial scales of variability, as calculated from the coupled, nested model, agree with those previously estimated from satellite images (for both surface temperature and pigment Abbott, 1988, 1994)). Model estimates of the characteristic temporal scales of variability, from decorrelation times, agree with those previously estimated from satellite images. Typical model decorrelation times lie between 2 and 4 days, in agreement with calculations from earlier sequences of (Coastal Zone Color Scanner (CZCS) and advanced very high resolution radiometer (AVHRR)) satellite images Abbott, 1988, 1994).

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Results from a three‐dimensional, nested biological‐physical model of the California Current System and comparisons with statistics from satellite imagery

et al. 2006

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Harding et al (1999b) provide specific descriptions of present capabilities as of 1998. However, the past 4 years have witnessed a dramatic 2000).…”

Section: Current Operational Ocean Forecasting-2002mentioning

confidence: 99%

Overview of Operational Ocean Forecasting in the U.S. Navy: Past, Present & Future

Burnett¹,

Harper²,

Preller³

et al. 2002

oceanog

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Ocean prediction capabilities (Present and Future) at the naval research laboratory

Cited by 2 publications

References 13 publications

Results from a three‐dimensional, nested biological‐physical model of the California Current System and comparisons with statistics from satellite imagery

Results from a three‐dimensional, nested biological‐physical model of the California Current System and comparisons with statistics from satellite imagery

Overview of Operational Ocean Forecasting in the U.S. Navy: Past, Present & Future

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About