2023
DOI: 10.1029/2023gl104822
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ocean Carbon Dioxide Uptake in the Tailpipe of Industrialized Continents

J. B. Palter,
S. Nickford,
L. Mu

Abstract: A simplifying assumption in many studies of ocean carbon uptake is that the atmosphere is well‐mixed, such that zonal variations in its carbon dioxide (CO2) content can be neglected in the calculation of air‐sea fluxes. Here, we examine this assumption at various scales to quantify the errors it introduces. For global annual averages, we find that positive and negative errors effectively cancel, so the use of atmospheric zonal‐average CO2 introduces reassuringly small errors in fluxes. However, for millions of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This systematic bias in wind speed translates to an 8% underestimate in the air‐sea CO 2 flux when using the ERA‐5 product in place of in situ wind speeds. The low bias increases to 9% when wind speed and significant wave height from ERA‐5 and the MBL zonal mean atmospheric p CO 2 product are used in place of in situ data, signaling that the true atmospheric p CO 2 is higher than its zonal mean in this region downwind of North America (Palter et al., 2023). These biases are similar as a percentage error whether using a wind‐only gas transfer velocity (e.g., Ho et al., 2006; Wanninkhof, 2014) or one that uses significant wave height to parameterize the bubble‐mediated flux (Deike & Melville, 2018), while the difference in average flux between these two gas transfer velocities is over 25%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This systematic bias in wind speed translates to an 8% underestimate in the air‐sea CO 2 flux when using the ERA‐5 product in place of in situ wind speeds. The low bias increases to 9% when wind speed and significant wave height from ERA‐5 and the MBL zonal mean atmospheric p CO 2 product are used in place of in situ data, signaling that the true atmospheric p CO 2 is higher than its zonal mean in this region downwind of North America (Palter et al., 2023). These biases are similar as a percentage error whether using a wind‐only gas transfer velocity (e.g., Ho et al., 2006; Wanninkhof, 2014) or one that uses significant wave height to parameterize the bubble‐mediated flux (Deike & Melville, 2018), while the difference in average flux between these two gas transfer velocities is over 25%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assume that the uncertainty in our air-sea CO 2 flux estimate results from a 20% uncertainty in k (Wanninkhof, 2014) and the overall product uncertainty in estimated pCO 2 (θpCO 2 ; Section 3.3 below). As the uncertainty of ΔpCO 2 is dominated by the uncertainty in estimated surface ocean pCO 2 , we neglect the contribution from atmospheric CO 2 despite potential point source effects nearshore (Palter et al, 2023). In our study area there are minimal industrial sources along much of the coastline, prevailing westerlies, monthly averaging, and air-sea disequilibrium is most often large nearshore (e.g., Salish Sea; Section 5.1).…”
Section: Computation Of Air-sea Fluxesmentioning
confidence: 99%