2010
DOI: 10.1021/es101509e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Occurrence of Xenobiotics in Gray Water and Removal in Three Biological Treatment Systems

Abstract: Eighteen selected xenobiotics related to personal care and household chemicals (UV-filters, fragrances, preservatives, biocides, surfactants) were measured in gray water from 32 houses and in effluents of three different biological treatment systems (aerobic, anaerobic, and combined anaerobic+aerobic). All selected xenobiotics were detected in gray water samples in the low microg L(-1) range. Generally, lower concentrations were measured after biological treatment and removal efficiencies were higher under aer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although they are often present in low concentration, various studies into effects on quality and ecological functioning of water systems show that these chemicals form a potential new problem. Their estrogenic and carcinogenic toxicity will impact the quality of ecological life and possibly also of human life [5]. There are currently no legally regulated maximum permitted concentrations of pharmaceuticals in the environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although they are often present in low concentration, various studies into effects on quality and ecological functioning of water systems show that these chemicals form a potential new problem. Their estrogenic and carcinogenic toxicity will impact the quality of ecological life and possibly also of human life [5]. There are currently no legally regulated maximum permitted concentrations of pharmaceuticals in the environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is quite a high volume of information about removal of pharmaceuticals and pesticides via ozonation, but the data available for personal care products, and especially for UV filters, is rather limited and somewhat ambiguous. For instance, whereas Rosal et al [39] did not observe any elimination of BP3 by ozone, other studies report removal efficiencies higher than 80% [40].…”
Section: Degradation Processesmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…All tests were done at environmental relevant concentrations (3 mg/L). Hernández Leal et al [40] studied the removal of some UV filters (4-MBC, BP3, OC and avobenzone) in different biological systems under aerobic and anaerobic conditions. Based on their high log K ow values, they assume that their high removal under aerobic conditions and also the variable yields of removal under anaerobic conditions are driven by adsorption and not by biodegradation.…”
Section: Degradation Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason for the observed removal in three studies (Table 1) might be different biological activities of the sludges used as inoculum sources but could also be due to different experimental setups or variable recovery rates due to the complex matrix. Moreover, several sampling strategies for the influent and effluent do not account for sorption processes in the reactors (such as anaerobic sludge blanket reactors) [28][29][30][31][32]. At the same time, there is great interest in the anerobic biotransformation processes of BPA [33][34][35][36][37].…”
Section: Experimental Setup Sample/inoculum Bpa Change Studymentioning
confidence: 99%