2015
DOI: 10.1017/s1755267215000056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Occurrence of the tropical eels Anguilla bengalensis bengalensis and Anguilla bicolor bicolor in Peninsular Malaysia and implications for eel taxonomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
30
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
30
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the Bonin and the Amami Islands, A. marmorata could live in every environment with no interspecific competition; thus estuarine‐dependent eels may be more abundant than in the Philippines and Taiwan. Similarly, only A. bicolor bicolor was found in the Pinang River region in Malaysia in our study, although A. bengalensis bengalensis was only found in Penang Island (Arai et al , ; Arai & Abdul Kadir, ). Thus, A. bicolor bicolor could also live in every environment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 46%
“…In the Bonin and the Amami Islands, A. marmorata could live in every environment with no interspecific competition; thus estuarine‐dependent eels may be more abundant than in the Philippines and Taiwan. Similarly, only A. bicolor bicolor was found in the Pinang River region in Malaysia in our study, although A. bengalensis bengalensis was only found in Penang Island (Arai et al , ; Arai & Abdul Kadir, ). Thus, A. bicolor bicolor could also live in every environment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 46%
“…For example, Arai and Amalina (2014) reported T. ilisha in Malaysian waters but based their identification only on external morphological characters. However, misidentifications are known to result from damaged or poor specimens and ambiguous morphological features (Arai and Wong 2016). Morphological characters are ineffective to distinguish species at some stages of development (Ward et al 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The identification of tropical shads to species solely on morphological characters is difficult because of similarities and overlapping characteristics which can lead to misidentifications (FAO 2012, Arai and Amalina 2014). Recently, several authors have suggested that to be accurate, species identifications need to be validated by molecular genetic analyses (Arai et al 2015, Arai and Wong 2016, Abdul Kadir et al 2017. Thus, identification of tropical shad species require the use of both traditional morphological characters and molecular genetic analyses, which we do here for T. ilisha and T. toli from Malaysian waters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For example, only three species of this genus, U. sulphureus (Tomascik 1997), U. sundaicus and U. tragula (Rahman et al 2009) are reported in Bangladesh waters based on their identification only on external morphological characters. However, misidentifications are known to result from damaged or poor specimens and ambiguous morphological features (Arai and Wong 2016). Morphological characters are ineffective to distinguish species at some stages of development (Ward et al 2009).…”
Section: Upeneus Supravittatus (Uiblein and Heemstra 2010)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Morphological characters are ineffective to distinguish species at some stages of development (Ward et al 2009). Several authors have suggested that molecular genetic analyses are necessary for precise species confirmation (Arai et al 2015, Arai and Wong 2016, Kadir et al 2017. However, on the basis of morphological characters and DNA barcoding, U. vittatus and U. supravittatus were newly recorded in Bangladesh.…”
Section: Upeneus Supravittatus (Uiblein and Heemstra 2010)mentioning
confidence: 99%