2016
DOI: 10.1002/2016ja022641
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Occurrence of the dayside three‐peak density structure in the F2 and the topside ionosphere

Abstract: In this work, we discuss the occurrence of the dayside three‐peak electron density structure in the ionosphere. We first use a set of ground‐based and satellite‐borne instruments to demonstrate the development of a large‐amplitude electron density perturbation at the recovery phase of a moderate storm of 11 October 2008. The perturbation developed in the F2 and low topside ionospheric regions over the American sector; it was concentrated on the north from the equatorial ionization anomaly (EIA) but was clearly… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
33
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
7
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, the southern hemisphere third peaks are (at 20°S geomag) not as far away from the geomagnetic equator as the one that they found (at 30°S geomag). It is accompanied by a weak EIA southern crest, whereas the third peak in Astafyeva et al (2016) did not necessarily coexist with a weaker EIA southern crest. Figure 9d in Astafyeva et al (2016) showed that sometimes the magnitude of this third peak could be much smaller than the two main crests of EIA.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…First, the southern hemisphere third peaks are (at 20°S geomag) not as far away from the geomagnetic equator as the one that they found (at 30°S geomag). It is accompanied by a weak EIA southern crest, whereas the third peak in Astafyeva et al (2016) did not necessarily coexist with a weaker EIA southern crest. Figure 9d in Astafyeva et al (2016) showed that sometimes the magnitude of this third peak could be much smaller than the two main crests of EIA.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…It is accompanied by a weak EIA southern crest, whereas the third peak in Astafyeva et al (2016) did not necessarily coexist with a weaker EIA southern crest. Figure 9d in Astafyeva et al (2016) showed that sometimes the magnitude of this third peak could be much smaller than the two main crests of EIA. Second, by checking the GOLD data, we mainly find this third peak phenomenon in October and November.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This permits us to consider the details of precipitation flux formation based on the steady‐state solution of Equation and explore the details of MI coupling between the two magnetically conjugate atmospheres and the magnetosphere and understand under what conditions interhemispheric asymmetry arises. In this paper, however, we do not discuss how these kinds of the asymmetries form and instead refer readers to many studies of this issue in the literature (e.g., Astafyeva et al, 2016, 2020; Ostgaard et al, 2016; Sato et al, 2016; Zesta et al, 2017, and references therein).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EIAs are two extended regions of elevated TEC located on opposite sides of geomagnetic equator (see Figure 1a). However, sometimes three distinct anomalies (Maruayama et al, 2016;Astafyeva et al, 2016Astafyeva et al, , 2017 or more are observed (see Figure 1b,c). These multiple daytime TEC intensifications may not fit into strict definition of EIAs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%