1996
DOI: 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1996.tb13892.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Occurrence of somaclonal variation among somatic embryo‐derived white spruces (Picea glauca, Pinaceae)

Abstract: Four different variegata phenotypes were identified among 2270 white spruce plants [Picea glauca (Moench.) Voss.] produced over a period of 2 yr from the time of induction of embryogenic tissues. The four variegated plants differed from each other in the extent and distribution of chlorophyll-deficient needles. Light microscopy showed that variegated leaves of a selected variant consisted of a chimeral mixture of green and white cells. Electron microscopy showed that cells in completely white needles had large… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results were reported using the RAPD technique in Norway spruce (Fourré et al 1997), Japanese black pine (Goto et al 1998), Japanese white oak (Thakur et al 1999), loblolly pine (Tang 2001), almond (Martins et al 2004), hazelnut (Nas et al 2004, pedunculate oak (Valladares et al 2006), cork oak (Fernandes et al 2011), apricot (Soliman 2012), annatto (Siril and Joseph 2013), and seedless lemon (Goswami et al 2013). In contrast, RAPD analysis reported genetic variation in poplar (Ostry et al 1994;Rani et al 1995), white spruce (Isabel et al 1995(Isabel et al , 1996, peach (Hashmi et al 1997), teak (Gangopadhyay et al 2003), Idaho locust (Ngezahayo et al 2006), stone pine (Cuesta et al 2010), and olive (Leva et al 2012).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Similar results were reported using the RAPD technique in Norway spruce (Fourré et al 1997), Japanese black pine (Goto et al 1998), Japanese white oak (Thakur et al 1999), loblolly pine (Tang 2001), almond (Martins et al 2004), hazelnut (Nas et al 2004, pedunculate oak (Valladares et al 2006), cork oak (Fernandes et al 2011), apricot (Soliman 2012), annatto (Siril and Joseph 2013), and seedless lemon (Goswami et al 2013). In contrast, RAPD analysis reported genetic variation in poplar (Ostry et al 1994;Rani et al 1995), white spruce (Isabel et al 1995(Isabel et al , 1996, peach (Hashmi et al 1997), teak (Gangopadhyay et al 2003), Idaho locust (Ngezahayo et al 2006), stone pine (Cuesta et al 2010), and olive (Leva et al 2012).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…We hypothesized that both procedures used could negatively affect the genetic stability of plant material. Several studies have reported somaclonal variation in embryonic cultures both after in vitro cultivation and after cryopreservation (Burg et al, 2007;DeVerno et al, 1999;Helmersson et al, 2008;Nawrot-Chorabik, 2009;Isabel et al, 1996;Krajňáková et al, 2011;Dey et al, 2015). In this study we report substantial genetic instability in SSR genotypes of the studied material as 52 different mutation events in total were detected.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Somaclonal variation was also reported in somatic embryo-derived plants of conifers. Four P. glauca plants with variegata phenotypes were found among 2270 regenerated plants (Isabel et al, 1996). In this study, one out of 250 RAPD markers was correlated with the white needles of the variegated plants.…”
mentioning
confidence: 54%