1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0045-6535(98)00167-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Occurrence of organochlorine insecticides, PCBs and PCB congeners in waters and sediments of the Ebro River (Spain)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
45
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
6
45
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is not surprising as the annual pesticide application in the Pearl River watershed (37 kg/ha) was five times the national average from 1980 to 1995 (Zhang et al, 2002). Globally, the levels of HCHs and DDTs detected in the Yangtze River (0.6e28.1 and nde16.7 ng/L, respectively), Yellow River (0.7e48.1 and 0.06e10.8 ng/L) and Pearl River (0.50e14.8 and 1.1e19.6 ng/L) were comparable to the concentrations obtained from Ebro River (0.2e28.6 and 2e6.8 ng/L) in Spain (Fernández et al, 1999) and Mumbai (0.2e15.9 and 3.0e33.2 ng/L) in India (Pandit et al, 2006) but were an order of magnitude lower than those in Red River (nde96.7 and ndÀ324 ng/L) in Vietnam (Hung and Thiemann, 2002) and Küçük Menderes River (187e337 and 72e120 ng/L) in Turkey (Turgut, 2003) (Table S1). Thus, the levels of HCHs and DDTs in China's rivers were generally similar to those in developed but less than those in rapidly developing and/or agriculturally based nations across the globe.…”
Section: Riverssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…This is not surprising as the annual pesticide application in the Pearl River watershed (37 kg/ha) was five times the national average from 1980 to 1995 (Zhang et al, 2002). Globally, the levels of HCHs and DDTs detected in the Yangtze River (0.6e28.1 and nde16.7 ng/L, respectively), Yellow River (0.7e48.1 and 0.06e10.8 ng/L) and Pearl River (0.50e14.8 and 1.1e19.6 ng/L) were comparable to the concentrations obtained from Ebro River (0.2e28.6 and 2e6.8 ng/L) in Spain (Fernández et al, 1999) and Mumbai (0.2e15.9 and 3.0e33.2 ng/L) in India (Pandit et al, 2006) but were an order of magnitude lower than those in Red River (nde96.7 and ndÀ324 ng/L) in Vietnam (Hung and Thiemann, 2002) and Küçük Menderes River (187e337 and 72e120 ng/L) in Turkey (Turgut, 2003) (Table S1). Thus, the levels of HCHs and DDTs in China's rivers were generally similar to those in developed but less than those in rapidly developing and/or agriculturally based nations across the globe.…”
Section: Riverssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…∑DDT concentrations in surface water samples were higher than that in Ebro River, Spain (3.40 ug/L) (Fernandez et al, 1999), while lower than those in the Yangtze River (nd-16.71 ug/L) (Tang et al, 2008), Huaihe River (4.44-33.59) (Feng et al, 2011) and Nestos River, Greece (nd-64.00 ug/L) (Golfinopoulos et al, 2003), and much lower than those in the Qiantang River (nd-204.1 ug/L) (Zhou et al, 2006), Gomti River, India (0.20-4578.00 ug/L) (Malik et al, 2007), and Kucuk Menderes River, Turkey (72-120 ug/L) (Turgut, 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 65%
“…in the river delta. Previous surveys conducted in the sampling area between 1999 and 2003 and more recent studies showed that besides HCB, DDT, PCE, and TCE, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, polybrominated diphenyl ethers, and brominated flame retardants could be detected in water, sediments, and biota of this river (12,14,18). Therefore, the lack of significant correlation between HCB pollution and Dehalococcoides composition and relative abundances may suggest that Dehalococcoides spp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%