2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00428-007-0555-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Occurrence of ocular melanoma thirteen years after skin melanoma: two separate primaries or metastatic disease? A case solved with NRAS and CDKN2A (INK4A-ARF) mutational analysis

Abstract: The differential diagnosis between primary uveal melanoma and cutaneous melanoma metastasis in the eye may be difficult, both clinically and histologically. We report successful application of combined mutational analysis of the NRAS and the CDKN2A gene to discriminate between these two entities. The patient had a history of a superficial spreading cutaneous melanoma of the left shoulder. Nine years later, she developed a lymph node metastasis in the left axilla, and 13 years later she presented with an atypic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, these NRAS and BRAF mutations are preserved in the progression of cutaneous melanomas 35 . This is an infrequent problem, since as a rule of thumb a melanoma metastasis is far more likely than a new primary non‐cutaneous melanoma in a patient with a previous history of cutaneous melanoma, 36 even in case of a long interval or a peculiar metastatic pattern 34 . Similarly, this BRAF and RAS mutation analysis might be of use in case of visceral melanoma localization in patients with a blank history for cutaneous melanoma to support a diagnosis of primary mucosal melanoma.…”
Section: Clinical Applications Of Cytogenetics In Melanocytic Tumoursmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, these NRAS and BRAF mutations are preserved in the progression of cutaneous melanomas 35 . This is an infrequent problem, since as a rule of thumb a melanoma metastasis is far more likely than a new primary non‐cutaneous melanoma in a patient with a previous history of cutaneous melanoma, 36 even in case of a long interval or a peculiar metastatic pattern 34 . Similarly, this BRAF and RAS mutation analysis might be of use in case of visceral melanoma localization in patients with a blank history for cutaneous melanoma to support a diagnosis of primary mucosal melanoma.…”
Section: Clinical Applications Of Cytogenetics In Melanocytic Tumoursmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In addition to CDKN2A testing, in some cases RAF or RAS mutation analysis could be performed, possibly together with KIT mutation analysis in case of a clinical problem in differentiating visceral metastasis of cutaneous melanoma from a new primary non‐cutaneous melanoma (as we described in a case in 2008) 34 . Cutaneous melanomas frequently harbour either BRAF or NRAS mutations and these are uncommon in non‐cutaneous types.…”
Section: Clinical Applications Of Cytogenetics In Melanocytic Tumoursmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our knowledge, a germline mutation of CDKN2A/P16 INK4A has been identified in only one family combining cases of both uveal and cutaneous melanomas among more than 90 uveal melanoma families [11] and in only one sporadic case of uveal melanoma in a series of 385 unselected cases [15]. However, it is noteworthy that the differential diagnosis between primary uveal melanoma and ocular metastasis from cutaneous melanoma may be difficult and this hypothesis cannot be ruled out in the two patients identified with a CDKN2A/P16 INK4A mutation [26]. In the study conducted by the Melanoma Genetics Consortium (GenoMEL), a CDKN2A/P16 INK4A mutation was identified in 190 of 466 (41%) melanoma-prone families with at least three relatives with malignant cutaneous melanoma [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Ocular metastasis of melanoma is rare, but is thought to be more likely in cases of widespread metastatic disease 7. The choroid is the most common site of involvement of metastases from cutaneous melanoma, representing 46% of cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%