2002
DOI: 10.1128/aem.68.1.161-165.2002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Occurrence ofCryptosporidiumandGiardiain Wild Ducks along the Rio Grande River Valley in Southern New Mexico

Abstract: Fecal samples were taken from wild ducks on the lower Rio Grande River around Las Cruces, N. Mex., from September 2000 to January 2001. Giardia cysts and Cryptosporidium oocysts were purified from 69 samples by sucrose enrichment followed by cesium chloride (CsCl) gradient centrifugation and were viewed via fluorescent-antibody (FA) staining. For some samples, recovered cysts and oocysts were further screened via PCR to determine the presence of Giardia lamblia and Crytosporidium parvum. The results of this st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
27
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
5
27
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The overall prevalence rate of 6.3% for Cryptosporidium spp. in the Australian avian hosts was low compared to previous studies which have reported prevalences ranging from 6 to 100% in farm-raised chickens (2, 7, 22, 27, 33), 20 to 60% in ducks and geese (9,11,33,39), and 22 to 100% in gulls (23,33). All the Australian fecal samples were obtained from aviaries and commercial poultry farms where strict sanitation procedures were in place including daily cleaning of cages and aviaries (e.g., changing paper trays and washing of the aviaries and water and food containers), which may account for the lower prevalences reported in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 44%
“…The overall prevalence rate of 6.3% for Cryptosporidium spp. in the Australian avian hosts was low compared to previous studies which have reported prevalences ranging from 6 to 100% in farm-raised chickens (2, 7, 22, 27, 33), 20 to 60% in ducks and geese (9,11,33,39), and 22 to 100% in gulls (23,33). All the Australian fecal samples were obtained from aviaries and commercial poultry farms where strict sanitation procedures were in place including daily cleaning of cages and aviaries (e.g., changing paper trays and washing of the aviaries and water and food containers), which may account for the lower prevalences reported in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 44%
“…In contrast, in the past 10 years there have been only about six reports (Trampel et al, 2000;Kimura et al, 2004;Huber et al, 2007;Soltane et al, 2007;Shemshadi et al, 2010;Smith et al, 2010). Likewise, there are only a few reports (about seven) concerning Cryptosporidium infections in ducks (Mason, 1986;Richter et al, 1994;O'Donoghue, 1995;Morgan et al, 2001;Kuhn et al, 2002;Huber et al, 2007;Amer et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The prevalence of cryptosporidiosis in ducks also varied among countries in the world. In the USA, an investigation indicated that 49% of ducks were carriers of Cryptosporidium (Kuhn et al, 2002). A study conducted in Germany showed a 57% (73/128) prevalence rate in ducks (Richter et al, 1994), whereas in Australia only one of 97 ducks examined was positive (Mason, 1986).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from enriching the aquatic ecosystems with chemical substances, water birds may be responsible for the microbial pollution of groundwater (Jones 2003) and surface water (Brieley et al 1975). Water birds can serve as reservoirs of bacteria pathogenic to humans, such as Escherichia coli (Kuhn et al 2002, Dobbin et al 2005.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%