2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2013.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Occurrence of generic Escherichia coli, E. coli O157 and Salmonella spp. in water and sediment from leafy green produce farms and streams on the Central California coast

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

15
117
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(138 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
15
117
4
Order By: Relevance
“…2). Previous work also has shown that generic E. coli (18), E. coli O157:H7 (27), Salmonella (28), and Listeria (29,30) are positively associated with livestock density or proximity to livestock. Similarly, studies that have aggregated reported EHEC illnesses to county or district levels have generally observed higher EHEC infection rates in counties with higher cattle densities, although this approach infers rather than directly links cases and exposures (19,20).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2). Previous work also has shown that generic E. coli (18), E. coli O157:H7 (27), Salmonella (28), and Listeria (29,30) are positively associated with livestock density or proximity to livestock. Similarly, studies that have aggregated reported EHEC illnesses to county or district levels have generally observed higher EHEC infection rates in counties with higher cattle densities, although this approach infers rather than directly links cases and exposures (19,20).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Although some pathogens are sufficiently prevalent to enable investigation of the effects of surrounding landscape composition on pathogens (16), low pathogen prevalence generally constrains such investigations. One response to this situation has been to relate landscape features to indicators (e.g., generic E. coli) as a proxy for known pathogens (17,18). Another approach has been to assume that exposures result primarily from contact with local livestock or Significance Fresh produce has become the primary cause of foodborne illness in the United States.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Water has been iden-tified as a major reservoir for pathogens and irrigation as a vehicle for transmission of pathogens to fields and produce (12,30,41,(72)(73)(74)(75). L. monocytogenes is often found in various water sources, with reported prevalence from Ͻ1% to 29% (14,76,77).…”
Section: Field Practices Associated With Presence Of Pathogensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent investigations have focused on irrigation water as a potential environmental source of Salmonella for preharvest contamination of produce (8)(9)(10)(11)12). Furthermore, the static nature of some irrigation ponds may sustain persistent populations of Salmonella (13,14).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recommended microbial standards for the quality of agricultural water that comes into direct contact with preharvest produce (other than sprouts) requires the threshold of generic Escherichia coli to be Ͻ410 most probable number (MPN)/100 ml for any single sample, with a geometric mean of Ͻ126 MPN/100 ml for all samples. Although this policy change will provide greater assurance of food safety, it may not be sufficient to eliminate risks from pathogens, such as Salmonella, that have shown little or no correlation between the level of the pathogen and that of generic E. coli (14,(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%