2023
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-023-29636-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Occurrence and removal of fecal bacteria and microbial source tracking markers in a stormwater detention basin overlying the Edwards Aquifer recharge zone in Texas

Mauricio Eduardo Flores,
Arash Jafarzadeh,
Sina Vedadi Moghadam
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 64 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of MST to provide evidence of specific faecal sources provides additional evidence for water managers to apply targeted mitigation strategies to reduce contamination (Devane et al, 2018 ; Harwood et al, 2014 ; Tran et al, 2015 ; Weller et al, 2020 ). Although dominant Avian faecal sources were widespread in water samples from all land‐uses including low impact (Table 4 ) and in previous study (Flores et al, 2023 ), other research using the same avian qPCR (GFD) detected avian faecal sources only rarely (Weller et al, 2020 ). Comparison of MST markers and E. coli phylotype B1 (Table S6 ) also correlated with the phylotype association with land‐use noted before (Table S2 ) where phylotype B1 was associated with ruminants (de Castro et al, 2014 ; Johnson et al, 2017 ; Massot et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…The use of MST to provide evidence of specific faecal sources provides additional evidence for water managers to apply targeted mitigation strategies to reduce contamination (Devane et al, 2018 ; Harwood et al, 2014 ; Tran et al, 2015 ; Weller et al, 2020 ). Although dominant Avian faecal sources were widespread in water samples from all land‐uses including low impact (Table 4 ) and in previous study (Flores et al, 2023 ), other research using the same avian qPCR (GFD) detected avian faecal sources only rarely (Weller et al, 2020 ). Comparison of MST markers and E. coli phylotype B1 (Table S6 ) also correlated with the phylotype association with land‐use noted before (Table S2 ) where phylotype B1 was associated with ruminants (de Castro et al, 2014 ; Johnson et al, 2017 ; Massot et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%