2016 19th International ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on Component-Based Software Engineering (CBSE) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/cbse.2016.14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

OccuRE: An Occupancy REasoning Platform for Occupancy-Driven Applications

Abstract: Occupant behavior determines a large share of the energy consumption of buildings. Software applications driven by information about occupant behavior provide a mean to optimize this share. However, existing systems for sensing occupancy behavior provide technology-specific APIs statically coupled to the type of computed occupancy information. Software platforms for developing applications for buildings do also not provide abstractions for occupancy behavior. Therefore, technology lock in and lack of proper ab… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…al. [5], compared count data obtained from PIR sensors in a building with ground-truth data. The results highlight that PIR sensors are not fit for occupant counting because of a RMSE of 21.7.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…al. [5], compared count data obtained from PIR sensors in a building with ground-truth data. The results highlight that PIR sensors are not fit for occupant counting because of a RMSE of 21.7.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, often these modalities alone only provide information with a high Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE). For instance, Kjaergaard et al [5] report a RMSE of 21.7 for counting occupants using PIR sensors in a small office building and [6] report an accuracy around 50% for counting occupants in a large hospital complex using WiFi access points. For CO 2 sensors existing work [7], [8] has shown that such sensors are often too error-prone to use for occupant sensing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the DR analyzer / scheduler we use the Controleum Framework [2], a multi-objective optimization framework using genetic algorithms. Zone-based indoor climate models are developed in Modelica, electricity forecasting models [9] in Java and wrapped in FMU wrappers, and occupancy prediction is done by the OccuRE system [10]. External data is accessed via drivers developed in Python and stored in sMAP [11] which offers fast querying over a timeseries database.…”
Section: The Adraloc Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One line of work has studied reusing common building sensors for occupancy counting including CO2 sensors, PIR sensors, energy metering, sensors of HVAC systems or WiFi access points [2] but often these sensors only provide counts with a high Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE). For instance Kjaergaard et al [8] report a RMSE of 21.7 for PIR in a small office building. Beltran et al [1] explore the idea of densely deploying lightweight thermal sensors for occupancy counting in all areas of a building.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3D camera-based counting sensors are quite accurate in the short term. For instance, Kjaergaard et al [8] report a RMSE of 3.3 for a three hours evaluation. However, particular detection problems associated with 3D cameras includes occlusion, pixel intensity fluctuations, and poor lighting conditions resulting in false positive and false negative counts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%