2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2011.06.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Occupational risk for cytomegalovirus, but not for parvovirus B19 in child-care personnel in France

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
18
1
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
18
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, none of them was associated with HCMV prevalence rate. So far, the previously reported results related to the influence of occupational contact with children on HCMV prevalence rates were contrary to our observations [ 21 , 37 – 40 ]. Based on those studies, we suggest that occupational contact with children is a population-dependent risk of HCMV infections.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, none of them was associated with HCMV prevalence rate. So far, the previously reported results related to the influence of occupational contact with children on HCMV prevalence rates were contrary to our observations [ 21 , 37 – 40 ]. Based on those studies, we suggest that occupational contact with children is a population-dependent risk of HCMV infections.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Beside the region and age, other socioeconomic risk factors for HCMV infections have also been reported [ 21 , 24 , 36 ]. Higher prevalence rates in correlation with lower socioeconomic status were determined in pregnant women from Finland (60.9 vs. 76.4 %) and India (63.4 vs. 96.9 %) [ 24 , 25 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CMV IgG seroprevalence was higher in pediatricians than in the controls, which was in accordance with another study that documented higher CMV seroprevalence in child caretakers (50). The CMV IgG titer suggested higher values for the high-exposure groups than the normal-exposure group.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The risk of infection is considered to be highest for women with an infected child in the home, the risk increasing with the number of children present. Whilst not all well-designed studies demonstrate an occupational risk (de Villemeur et al, 2011;Stelma et al, 2009), others clearly do (Adler et al, 1993;Gillespie et al, 1990), including a large Danish study involving over 30 000 serum samples (Valeur-Jensen et al, 1999), which confirmed that the intensity of exposure to children at work is a significant risk factor for acute B19V infection. The cost in financial terms of antenatal screening for B19V is thought excessive (Gärtner et al, 2007), but that cost analysis may be underestimating the true burden of fetal loss and discounting the potential financial impact of occupational leave for non-immune women.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%