Tobacco smoke is the major risk factor for lung cancer and accounts for about 80-95% of lung cancers in men (Parkin et al, 1994). Many of the potential risk factors for lung cancer other than active smoking, such as environmental tobacco smoke (Hackshaw et al, 1997;Boffetta et al, 1998), residential radon (BEIR VI, 1998), diet (Brennan et al, 2000), occupational hazards (Keller and Howe, 1993;Pohlabeln et al, 2000), previous non-neoplastic lung disease (Wu et al, 1995;Mayne et al, 1999), family history of lung cancer (Schwartz et al, 1996;Brownson et al, 1997) and genetic susceptibility (Bennett et al, 1999) show relative risk estimates less than two, which are about ten times smaller in magnitude than the relative risk of cigarette smoking. To determine the extent to which these risk factors contribute to lung cancer, studies of lifetime nonsmokers are preferable, because otherwise adequate controlling for smoking is difficult.About 10-30% of European and American women with lung cancer report never having smoked in their life, in contrast to only 2% of male cases (Koo and Ho, 1990). A large body of evidence on potential risk factors for lung cancer in nonsmokers has been accumulated (Brownson et al, 1998); this knowledge, however, is nearly exclusively based on studies conducted in women. We therefore used data from a large case-control study on lung cancer and indoor radon, conducted from 1990-1996 in Germany, to focus on nonsmoking men. Some of the findings have been published previously Kreuzer et al, 1998Kreuzer et al, , 1999Kreuzer et al, , 2000Brüske-Hohlfeld et al, 2000;Kreienbrock et al, 2000). The present paper describes our major findings on the relation between residential radon, occupational exposure, environmental tobacco smoke, family history of cancer and previous lung disease and risk of lung cancer in nonsmoking men.
MATERIALS AND METHODSData on nonsmokers were derived from a case-control study of lung cancer and indoor radon conducted from 1990-1996 in several regions of East and West Germany. The data collection methods have been described previously Kreienbrock et al, 2000). In brief, newly diagnosed cases with histologically or cytologically confirmed lung cancer as a primary tumour were recruited from 15 study clinics in the defined study area. Cases were eligible if: (1) they were less than 76 years old; (2) they were currently resident in the study area; (3) they had lived in Germany for more than 25 years; (4) the interviews were within 3 months after diagnosis; and (5) they were not too ill. The response rate of eligible cases was 76%. Population controls satisfying inclusion criteria 1-3 were randomly selected from mandatory registries or by modified random-digit dialing and were frequency matched to the cases on sex, age and region. The response rate of eligible controls was 41%.A total of 4303 cases and 4451 population controls including smokers and nonsmokers, as well as men and women, were personally interviewed by a trained interviewer. A standardized questionnaire was used to d...