1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0274(199811)34:5<421::aid-ajim2>3.0.co;2-t
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Occupational risk factors and prostate cancer in U.S. Blacks and Whites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
42
5
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
4
42
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A large casecontrol study found that most of the jobs associated with prostate cancer had the potential for occupational PAH exposure [12]. In three separate studies that examined specific occupational exposures, two found modest associations between selected PAH sources and prostate cancer [14,15], while the third found no link between PAH-related exposures and prostate cancer [42].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A large casecontrol study found that most of the jobs associated with prostate cancer had the potential for occupational PAH exposure [12]. In three separate studies that examined specific occupational exposures, two found modest associations between selected PAH sources and prostate cancer [14,15], while the third found no link between PAH-related exposures and prostate cancer [42].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PAH are thought to exert their carcinogenic properties through their ability to form PAH-DNA adducts [9][10][11]. Both casecontrol [12] and cohort [13] studies have found that most jobs associated with occupational PAH exposure have the potential for prostate cancer. Associations between prostate cancer and specific occupational PAH exposure sources have also been reported [14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also saw a non-significant increase in prostate cancer risk for Caucasian men employed in service (OR=2.64, 95% CI 0.82-8.48). Krstev et al [17] reported elevated prostate cancer risks among African-American men, but not Caucasian men, for plant and system operators (OR=4.06) and other laborers (OR=1.37) (which are within our production occupations category), and African-American and Caucasian men employed in service (OR=1.41). They attributed these findings to potential exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Krstev, Burgess, Crutchfield, Storment, Gerkin, and Winston (1998a,b) performed two case studies on prostate cancer: a smaller study based on 981 pathologically confirmed prostate cancer cases (Krstev et al, 1998a) and a larger study based on 60,878 American men who died of prostate cancer (Krstev et al, 1998b). The smaller case study by Krstev et al (1998a) which was a case study on 981 new pathologically confirmed prostate cancer cases included 479 blacks and 502 whites who were diagnosed between 1986 and 1989, and 1,315 population controls (594 blacks and 721 whites). All of the cases and controls resided in either: Atlanta, Detroit, or in 10 counties in New Jersey.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this small case-control study, the authors calculated odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). The results indicated that firefighters had an increased risk of developing prostate cancer (chi2 trend, p = 0.02) (Krstev et al, 1998a). Due to the dependence on recall, the interviews can only show patterns of chemical exposure without scientific validity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%