2004
DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.773
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Occupational radiation dose estimation for Finnish aircraft cabin attendants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The estimated mean annual effective dose of 2.5 mSv for the 5898 cohort members who completed the work history questionnaire was comparable to the mean annual dose of 3.1 mSv (median 3.2 mSv; range 0 -9.5 mSv) reported in another questionnaire-based exposure study of 544 Finnish fl ight attendants ( 9 ). Other studies of cosmic radiation exposure among fl ight attendants reported estimated mean annual doses of 0.7 to 3.8 mSv ( 10 , 17 , 22 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…The estimated mean annual effective dose of 2.5 mSv for the 5898 cohort members who completed the work history questionnaire was comparable to the mean annual dose of 3.1 mSv (median 3.2 mSv; range 0 -9.5 mSv) reported in another questionnaire-based exposure study of 544 Finnish fl ight attendants ( 9 ). Other studies of cosmic radiation exposure among fl ight attendants reported estimated mean annual doses of 0.7 to 3.8 mSv ( 10 , 17 , 22 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Occupational dose was estimated based on number of active work years assessed from the dates of start and end of cabin work obtained from Finnair and the Finnish Cabin Crew Union. This information was combined with the estimated mean annual cosmic radiation dose by calendar period, 13 to obtain a crude estimate of cosmic radiation dose for every person. The analyses were adjusted with age.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 The occupational radiation dose assessment method has been described in detail elsewhere. 13 All the study subjects gave written informed consent for participation. The Finnish Advisory Board for Radiation Safety approved the study protocol.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This assessment is an improvement over selfreported flight attendant questionnaire responses, which have been found to overreport exposures (Grajewski et al, 2004;Kojo et al, 2004). Flights are generally logged by pilots in real time, which reduces recall bias compared to retrospective questionnaire responses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%