2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.110781
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Occupational heat stress and economic burden: A review of global evidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
40
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
1
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, only certain health impacts were explored here, not all possible adverse outcomes. A growing literature links heat with a wide range of adverse health outcomes (cardiorespiratory effects [ 42 ], mental health [ 43 ], pregnancy outcome [ 44 ], occupational health, and productivity loss [ 45 , 46 ]). In particular, the loss of productivity and of working time directly affects the private sector: Vanos et al [ 47 ] show for Canadian outdoor industrial workers that the loss may be about 1% of the annual number of hours worked, Orlov et al [ 48 ] estimate the hourly mean costs for agricultural and construction workers in 10 European countries at about $4.4 in July 2015, and Zhang et al [ 49 ] estimate US labor losses due to temperature differences between 2006–2016 and 1980–1990 at about $1.7 billion per year.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, only certain health impacts were explored here, not all possible adverse outcomes. A growing literature links heat with a wide range of adverse health outcomes (cardiorespiratory effects [ 42 ], mental health [ 43 ], pregnancy outcome [ 44 ], occupational health, and productivity loss [ 45 , 46 ]). In particular, the loss of productivity and of working time directly affects the private sector: Vanos et al [ 47 ] show for Canadian outdoor industrial workers that the loss may be about 1% of the annual number of hours worked, Orlov et al [ 48 ] estimate the hourly mean costs for agricultural and construction workers in 10 European countries at about $4.4 in July 2015, and Zhang et al [ 49 ] estimate US labor losses due to temperature differences between 2006–2016 and 1980–1990 at about $1.7 billion per year.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14,15 The combined effects of metabolic rate, clothing, and workplace conditions have been shown to induce hyperthermia (i.e., increased core temperature), 13 accelerate dehydration, [16][17][18][19] and alter perceptual and subjective responses to heat. 17,[20][21][22][23] Together, these factors transform physical working conditions 3,6 and introduce potential hazards to the work setting (e.g., grip problems from sweat, sweat in eyes, distraction, and timeoff-task) (Figure 1). All factors presented in Figure 1 describe heatrelated presenteeism, which can be defined as losses in productivity when workers are not fully functioning in the workplace (i.e., reductions in physical capacity) due to heat stress.…”
Section: Heat-related Presenteeismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cognitive decrements not only impair worker production output (i.e., physical work capacity) but can increase risk of injury at the worksite. 6 For example, a case-crossover study in outdoor construction workers reported a 0.5% increase in the odds of traumatic injuries per 1°C increase in maximum daily humidex (odds ratio 1.005 [95% CI 1.003-1.007]). 35 Changes in the work environment induced by heat exposure can also influence the occurrence of workplace injuries.…”
Section: Heat-related Presenteeismmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations