Highlights We found that, in a hot environment, physical workload (in terms of energy expenditure) of rebar work is: overall rebar work (2.57Kcal/min), bar bending (2.26Kcal/min) and bar fixing (2.67Kcal/min). Bar fixing induced significantly higher physiological responses in heart rate, percentage of maximal heart rate, oxygen consumption, energy expenditure as compared to bar bending. Perceptual response was also higher in bar fixing as compared to bar bending, but such difference was not statistically significant. oxygen consumption (9.53 vs. 7.14 ml/min/kg, p < 0.05), and energy expenditure (2.67 vs.2.26 Kcal/min, p < 0.05) (186 vs. 158 W, p < 0.05) as compared to bar bending. Perceptual response was higher in bar fixing but such difference was not statistically significant.Findings of this study enable the calculation of daily energy expenditure of rebar work.