2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjane.2017.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Occupational hazards, DNA damage, and oxidative stress on exposure to waste anesthetic gases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
48
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
3
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, in agreement with our results, Paes et al (2014) demonstrated that; medical residents occupationally exposed to waste anesthetic gases induced DNA damage and antioxidant status. Also, our results agree with Lucio et al (2018) who detected that; genotoxic and oxidative stress effects due to occupational exposure to anesthetic gases among operating room personnel. This demonstrates the requirement for an adequate system for circumventing exposure to a noxious atmosphere.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, in agreement with our results, Paes et al (2014) demonstrated that; medical residents occupationally exposed to waste anesthetic gases induced DNA damage and antioxidant status. Also, our results agree with Lucio et al (2018) who detected that; genotoxic and oxidative stress effects due to occupational exposure to anesthetic gases among operating room personnel. This demonstrates the requirement for an adequate system for circumventing exposure to a noxious atmosphere.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The surgical environment pollution with WAGs is essentially due to three causes: anesthetic techniques, anesthesia workstation, and with or without a scavenging system (Yasny and White 2012). There are many factors play role in occurance of WAGs such as: (1) administration of inhalational anesthesia through face mask; (2) failure to switch off the valve of gas owmeter and vaporizer; (3) spillage of anesthetic when loading the vaporizer; (4) performing ushing after nishing of surgical procedure to quicken recovery from inhalational anesthesia (common and extremely harmful practice); (5) problems accompanied facial mask such as usage of inappropriate material, wrong size or abnormalities in the patient's airway; (6) leakage of inhalational anesthesia during use of inadequate endotracheal tube cuff or laryngeal mask in ation, or uncuffed endotracheal tube (Lucio et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although mechanisms by which halogenated anesthetics induce genotoxicity remain to be elucidated, plausible explanations include the production of ROS due to oxidation metabolism and/or direct genome damage. 18,37,38 Furthermore, nitrous oxide-induced impairment of methionine synthase affects nucleic acid and protein production, which in turn reduces genomic stability. 39 The evidence regarding the genotoxic and mutagenic effects of chronic (long-term) occupational exposure to waste anesthetic gases that has been reported in the literature is controversial.…”
Section: F I G U R Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 Oxidative stress, defined as an imbalance between the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and antioxidant defenses, 12 and changes in immune parameters have also been linked to long-term waste anesthetic gas exposure. [13][14][15][16][17][18] Therefore, various studies on the hazards of occupational exposure to waste anesthetic gases have been published but have focused on chronic exposure, which means that the operating room personnel have been exposed for several years or decades. However, the impact of a shorter exposure to anesthetic gases, especially in young adult physicians at the end of their medical residency program, remains unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The US National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) defines waste anaesthetic gases (WAGs) as small amounts of volatile anaesthetic gases leaking into operating rooms during anaesthetic delivery [1,2]. In the USA, chronic exposure to WAGs affects more than 200,000 healthcare professionals, including anaesthesiologists, surgeons, operating room nurses and technicians [1,3,4]. Shortterm exposure (acute; during or within hours after anaesthesia procedure) to high concentrations of WAGs could lead to headache, irritability, nausea and drowsiness immediately upon or shortly after exposure, whereas longterm exposure (chronic; working over months or years in an operating room setting) to low concentrations is associated with genetic anomalies, miscarriage, birth defects and malignancy that may occur after several months [1,[5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%