2019
DOI: 10.1080/08958378.2019.1645768
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Occupational exposures to cosmetic talc and risk of mesothelioma: an updated pooled cohort and statistical power analysis with consideration of latency period

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fordyce et al (2019) reported one mesothelioma death in an individual that occurred 30 years after their employment of less than 5 years in the Vermont talc industry, “leaving open the possibility of exposure to asbestos in other occupations and/or possible exposure to ionizing radiation.” Fordyce et al (2019) noted that the death certificate associated with this mesothelioma “explicitly mentioned exposure to asbestos.” Thus, a brief employment in the talc industry is likely unrelated to the etiology of this individual’s mesothelioma. Also, it is notable that pneumoconiosis, a non-malignant respiratory disease, has been reported in these cohorts of cosmetic talc miners and millers, which indicated that cumulative exposures to talc in these workers were not insignificant (Finley et al, 2017; Marsh et al, 2019). If inhaled cosmetic talc indeed presents a mesothelioma hazard and mesothelioma risk increases with exposure, an increased risk should be observed in these highly exposed cosmetic talc miners and millers based on the most fundamental tenet of toxicology and health risk assessment; the concept of the dose-response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Fordyce et al (2019) reported one mesothelioma death in an individual that occurred 30 years after their employment of less than 5 years in the Vermont talc industry, “leaving open the possibility of exposure to asbestos in other occupations and/or possible exposure to ionizing radiation.” Fordyce et al (2019) noted that the death certificate associated with this mesothelioma “explicitly mentioned exposure to asbestos.” Thus, a brief employment in the talc industry is likely unrelated to the etiology of this individual’s mesothelioma. Also, it is notable that pneumoconiosis, a non-malignant respiratory disease, has been reported in these cohorts of cosmetic talc miners and millers, which indicated that cumulative exposures to talc in these workers were not insignificant (Finley et al, 2017; Marsh et al, 2019). If inhaled cosmetic talc indeed presents a mesothelioma hazard and mesothelioma risk increases with exposure, an increased risk should be observed in these highly exposed cosmetic talc miners and millers based on the most fundamental tenet of toxicology and health risk assessment; the concept of the dose-response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Thus, a brief employment in the talc industry is likely unrelated to the etiology of this individual's mesothelioma. Also, it is notable that pneumoconiosis, a non-malignant respiratory disease, has been reported in these cohorts of cosmetic talc miners and millers, which indicated that cumulative exposures to talc in these workers were not insignificant (Finley et al, 2017;Marsh et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, Ilgren et al (2017) found no asbestos in their analysis, only non-asbestiform tremolite cleavage fragments. It is reassuring, indeed, that a robust body of epidemiological studies at Italian mines have supported this conclusion, consistently showing no association with mesothelioma and lung cancer risk (Ciocan et al, 2022;Coggiola et al, 2003;Ierardi et al, 2022;Marsh et al, 2019;Pira et al, 2017;Rubino et al, 1976Rubino et al, , 1979.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%