2022
DOI: 10.1097/jom.0000000000002481
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Occupational Exposures and Lung Cancer Risk—An Analysis of the CARTaGENE Study

Abstract: Objective:To determine the associations between prevalent occupational agents and lung cancer risk.Methods:A case-cohort design (ncases= 147; nsub-cohort= 1,032) was nested within the CARTaGENE prospective cohort study. The Canadian Job Exposure Matrix was used to determine the probability of exposure to 27 agents in participants’ longest-held jobs. Multivariable logistic regression with robust variance estimators was used to determine the associations between each agent and lung cancer risk while adjusting fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings suggest that gender-specific factors could modify the impact of this genetic variant on lung cancer susceptibility. Hormonal variations [ 26 , 27 ], lifestyle preferences [ 28 31 ], or occupational exposures [ 32 34 ] are potential contributors to this gender-associated effect. Nonetheless, the underlying mechanisms and biological basis for these gender disparities remain unclear and require further investigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings suggest that gender-specific factors could modify the impact of this genetic variant on lung cancer susceptibility. Hormonal variations [ 26 , 27 ], lifestyle preferences [ 28 31 ], or occupational exposures [ 32 34 ] are potential contributors to this gender-associated effect. Nonetheless, the underlying mechanisms and biological basis for these gender disparities remain unclear and require further investigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, a sensitivity analysis, called “leave-one-out”, was conducted by leaving out one SNP at a time to assess if a single SNP had a disproportionate effect on the overall estimation. Finally, we searched on the PhenoScanner3 website ( http://www.phenoscanner.medschl.cam.ac.uk ) to investigate the presence of SNPs linked to any confounding factors, including smoking behaviors ( 32 34 ), sedentary behaviors and physical activity ( 35 , 36 ), educational attainment ( 37 ), anti-oxidants ( 38 ), dietary intake and food supplement intake ( 39 ), and job of participants ( 40 ), which have been identified as common risk factors of respiratory diseases. If any were found, we eliminated these SNPs and replicated the IVW analysis to evaluate the robustness of the results.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tobacco exposure stands undoubtedly as a leading common denominator shared by the two diseases; however, it must be considered that only about 30% of smokers eventually develop clinically significant COPD, while 10-15% develop lung cancer [37]. In a similar manner, occupational as well as particulate matter (PM) exposure represent major risk factors for both LC and COPD [38][39][40][41]. Moreover, the scenario is by far more complicated.…”
Section: Copd and Lung Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%