2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2010.05.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Occupational exposure to gasoline and the risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma: A review and meta-analysis of the literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the low use of OCs and HRT in Taiwan, we were able to assess parity and age at first birth with limited influence from exogenous hormones. Finally, omitted variable bias is another limitation; we lacked data on other hypothesized occupational and environmental risk factors, such as exposure to benzene, gasoline, and phenoxy acids and chlorophenol herbicides [ 5 , 42 , 43 ]. Nevertheless, the potential for confounding socioeconomic factors should be evaluated.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the low use of OCs and HRT in Taiwan, we were able to assess parity and age at first birth with limited influence from exogenous hormones. Finally, omitted variable bias is another limitation; we lacked data on other hypothesized occupational and environmental risk factors, such as exposure to benzene, gasoline, and phenoxy acids and chlorophenol herbicides [ 5 , 42 , 43 ]. Nevertheless, the potential for confounding socioeconomic factors should be evaluated.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent meta-analyses have found no association between benzene exposure and NHL occurrence [15,16]. An absence of relationship was also reported for gasoline emission vapours, at exposure levels encountered in the petroleum industry [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Although heterogeneity estimates were not calculated, a recent review and meta-analysis of gasoline and NHL risk looked at most of the same studies evaluated in the current study and did not identify significant heterogeneity issues. 9 Nonetheless, mixed effects models were utilized in this meta-analysis to account for heterogeneity. In addition, some of the studies included in the current analysis may have been somewhat redundant (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%