2014
DOI: 10.2478/10004-1254-65-2014-2493
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Occupational Exposure to Blood Among Hospital Workers in Montenegro

Abstract: This cross-sectional study was performed in nine Montenegrin hospitals to estimate the burden of occupational exposure to blood among hospital workers in Montenegro in 2010 using a modified Croatian self-reporting questionnaire on exposure to blood-borne infections. Of the 1043 respondents, 517 (49.6 %) reported exposure to blood. Variations between the hospitals were not significant, except for the hospital in Kotor, which stands out with the high percentage of exposed hospital workers (p<0.05). More than 77 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
1
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
7
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Nearly 66 % of the respondents reported at least one BBF exposure in their career, and 39 % reported at least one such accident in 2012 (Table 2). Compared to the neighbouring and EU countries, our one-year BBF exposure prevalence among HCWs was lower than in Montenegro (9) and France (10), but higher than in Bosnia and Herzegovina (11) and Germany (12).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 65%
“…Nearly 66 % of the respondents reported at least one BBF exposure in their career, and 39 % reported at least one such accident in 2012 (Table 2). Compared to the neighbouring and EU countries, our one-year BBF exposure prevalence among HCWs was lower than in Montenegro (9) and France (10), but higher than in Bosnia and Herzegovina (11) and Germany (12).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 65%
“…This study was however carried out among resident doctors. In this study, only 25% of those with NSI reported to the ICT and this is similar to findings from other studies [2] [11] [15]. The primary reasons for not reporting were that they were not aware of an Infectious Control Team and that the source patient was HIV negative.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Of the 182 OBBFEs, 98.9% were reported to the relevant authorities, with the majority (83.5%) being reported within 24 h of the exposure. A report rate of 77% was found in a study in Montenegro, 14 compared with a lower report rate of 30% amongst medical trainees in East Toronto General Hospital. 8 Kassa et al in Botswana also found a low report rate of 37%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%