2021
DOI: 10.1080/10962247.2021.1934185
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Occupational exposure to anaerobic bacteria in a waste sorting plant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors concluded that no occupational risk exists at this level of contamination [50]. Another study concerning a waste sorting facility reported an average concentration of total bacteria of 4347 CFU/m 3 (SD = 2439), considered excessive and resulting in a recommendation of an extensive use of Personal Protective Equipment [51]. A third interesting recent evaulation of the working condition in wastewater treatments plants in Denmark reported that 14% and 34% of the personal exposure were exceeded for endotoxin (>50 EU/m 3 ) and bacteria (>500 CFU/m 3 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The authors concluded that no occupational risk exists at this level of contamination [50]. Another study concerning a waste sorting facility reported an average concentration of total bacteria of 4347 CFU/m 3 (SD = 2439), considered excessive and resulting in a recommendation of an extensive use of Personal Protective Equipment [51]. A third interesting recent evaulation of the working condition in wastewater treatments plants in Denmark reported that 14% and 34% of the personal exposure were exceeded for endotoxin (>50 EU/m 3 ) and bacteria (>500 CFU/m 3 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, recent reports indicate that the treatment of municipal waste is accompanied by a strong emission of anaerobic bacteria. Thus far, their presence has been confirmed in waste-sorting plants [ 1 , 26 ], in a composting plant [ 27 ], and in landfills [ 37 ]. In our study, their percentage contribution to the total bacteria pool was about 18%, which was several times less than, for example, in a waste-sorting plant [ 26 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus far, their presence has been confirmed in waste-sorting plants [ 1 , 26 ], in a composting plant [ 27 ], and in landfills [ 37 ]. In our study, their percentage contribution to the total bacteria pool was about 18%, which was several times less than, for example, in a waste-sorting plant [ 26 ]. Interestingly, no bacteria from this group were found in the office premises, while 10 species belonging to 8 genera were identified at work sites in the incineration plant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previously published studies have brought significant knowledge regarding the exposure of workers in WSPs. Thus, ambient concentrations and individual exposures to airborne dust, microorganisms (bacteria, fungi), microbial compounds (endotoxins, (1,3)β-D-glucans), and metabolites (mycotoxins) found in WSPs have been documented to improve diagnosis [6][7][8][9][10]. Knowledge about the taxa composition of microbial communities in bioaerosols from WSPs has been improved through studies using methods based on the identification of cultivated isolates [11][12][13] and based on high throughput sequencing (HTS) [14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%