2019
DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncz184
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Occupational Dose and Radiation Protection Practice in Uae: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Cohort Study (2002–2016)

Abstract: A two-phased retrospective cross-sectional study analysed the occupational dose and radiation protection practice among medical workers in two hospitals in the UAE. Phase 1 evaluated radiation protection practice using a questionnaire, whereas phase 2 assessed the occupational dose. Readings of 952 thermoluminescence dosimeters were analyzed. The result showed 52% of medical workers have a good level of radiation protection practice. Readings of 952 thermoluminescence dosimeters were analyzedAverage annual eff… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…50 The perceived reduction of patient numbers may also have been potentially due to adherence to national and international guidance to minimize non-urgent work in the radiology department, 55,56 as well as due to infection control issues related to transporting COVID-19 patients to CT scanners and availability of CT modality in the departments. 57 While the study did not investigate the occupational radiation dose, it is worth emphasising the importance of radiation safety for all RWF members 58 ; corrective actions are needed to comply with radiation safety and protection during radiology examinations. 59 Moreover, proper radiation protection for patients should be implemented 60 to ensure radiation safety practice in both routine and crisis situations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…50 The perceived reduction of patient numbers may also have been potentially due to adherence to national and international guidance to minimize non-urgent work in the radiology department, 55,56 as well as due to infection control issues related to transporting COVID-19 patients to CT scanners and availability of CT modality in the departments. 57 While the study did not investigate the occupational radiation dose, it is worth emphasising the importance of radiation safety for all RWF members 58 ; corrective actions are needed to comply with radiation safety and protection during radiology examinations. 59 Moreover, proper radiation protection for patients should be implemented 60 to ensure radiation safety practice in both routine and crisis situations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Out of 272 radiographers registered in Ministry of Health and Prevention (MOHAP), the sample size was estimated to be 45 mammographers working at mammography screening centers. 19…”
Section: Sample Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidently, the professionals in Mongolia had a tendency of not using PPE, compared to high-and lower-middle-income countries. 9,10 In the United Arab Emirates, 70% of radiologists and 83% of technicians always wore lead aprons at work. Meanwhile, 50% of radiologists and 74% of technologists used a thyroid shield during interventional procedures, and 70% of both radiologists and technologists sometimes used lead gloves.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, 50% of radiologists and 74% of technologists used a thyroid shield during interventional procedures, and 70% of both radiologists and technologists sometimes used lead gloves. 9 In Egypt, 78.1% of radiographers always wore lead aprons, and 52.3% always wore thyroid shields during fluoroscopy procedures. 10 In Mongolia, PPE use among professionals was clearly inadequate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%