2021
DOI: 10.1177/03080226211057842
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Occupational disruptions during lockdown, by generation: A European descriptive cross-sectional survey

Abstract: Introduction The periods of lockdown during 2020 led to changes in daily occupations. As participation relies on dynamic interactions between the person, his/her occupations and his/her environment, we wondered whether people from different generations shared the same perception of occupational disruptions during the lockdown. Methods We performed an online survey based on the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) of adults in 27 European Union countries, the United Kingdom and Switzerland. Three gr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparing our results to previous studies about occupational disruption during the COVID-19 epidemic is challenging because the tools relate to different occupations. For instance, in contrast to our results, a European descriptive cross-sectional survey found leisure, which could be perceived as recreation, to be the most-affected occupation during the lockdowns (Engels et al, 2022). However, dividing leisure into active leisure and quiet recreation shows more precise results.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Comparing our results to previous studies about occupational disruption during the COVID-19 epidemic is challenging because the tools relate to different occupations. For instance, in contrast to our results, a European descriptive cross-sectional survey found leisure, which could be perceived as recreation, to be the most-affected occupation during the lockdowns (Engels et al, 2022). However, dividing leisure into active leisure and quiet recreation shows more precise results.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…During the lockdown, people were forced to stay at home, resulting in a massive shift in how they lived, worked, socialized, and played. People adapted with marked changes in their daily occupations, routines, and habits (Brown, 2021; Engels et al, 2022). Staying at home created many uncertainties in self-efficacy regarding personal health, economic status, and social situations (Lin & Fisher, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Except for the performance score recorded by OAs regarding self-care occupations, all the satisfaction and performance score increased by ≥2 points; this is considered to be a clinically significant difference (M. [ 17 ]). Although lockdown led to 6549 restricted occupations in the same sample (mainly leisure activities (83%) and productive activities (16%) [ 12 ]), it also allowed more engagement in and greater satisfaction with some occupations. Lastly, we observed a two-point difference between YAs and OAs with regard to the change in the leisure performance score.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We therefore wondered whether people of different ages manage differently during lockdown. In the first publication, we explored occupational disruption during lockdown, by generation [ 12 ]. In the present study, we sought to determine how opportunities for occupational engagement were taken up during lockdown, in order to objectify and quantify occupations that were more frequently performed by the general population in a context of environmental restrictions that had never been applied before on such a broad scale.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These measures included social distancing, staying at home recommendations, closing schools and non-essential workplaces, using masks, and personal hygiene. These response measures and limitations significantly affected the daily occupations of all age groups (Engels et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%