2019
DOI: 10.1111/ecoj.12634
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Occupational Choice with Endogenous Spillovers

Abstract: We study a model that integrates productive and socialising efforts with occupational choice, and endogenous spillovers. We show that more talented individuals work harder and contribute more to externalities, but also have incentives to segregate. Average socialising increases the productivity of the occupation. The size of an occupation grows with its synergies. Individuals underinvest in productive and socialising effort, and sort themselves inefficiently into occupations. We derive the optimal subsidy for … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
(68 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The experiment is carried over four years -following students through their full degree programs-in a large Spanish university. 1 Students in the control group, as per usual, receive only information on their own performance, while students in the treatment group are provided with their decile rank with respect to other students in their cohort. Relative performance feedback is provided to treated students for the first time at the end of the first semester of their second year of their program and is updated every six months until the end of the fourth (and final) year of the degree.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experiment is carried over four years -following students through their full degree programs-in a large Spanish university. 1 Students in the control group, as per usual, receive only information on their own performance, while students in the treatment group are provided with their decile rank with respect to other students in their cohort. Relative performance feedback is provided to treated students for the first time at the end of the first semester of their second year of their program and is updated every six months until the end of the fourth (and final) year of the degree.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As discussed above, the evidence presented in Table 4, together with the institutional features of the CTC (i.e., firms must apply for membership and, conditional on being accepted, must pay a per-period fixed membership fee), raises the concern that firms may have self-selected into the organization based on productivity or performance (e.g., as in a standard Melitz (2003)-type model). For instance, Albornoz, Cabrales, and Hauk (2019) write a model in which more productive firms invest more in socializing, networking, and acquiring information, which in turn increases their productivity. Section 4 presents qualitative evidence that large firms do in fact participate in the organization more than others.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the socialization effort chosen by all active individuals, a social network is formed by a random process that matches individuals based on their socialization effort. Following Albornoz et al (2019), we assume that the link intensity between two individuals 𝑖 and ℎ is given by 𝑔(𝑠 𝑖 , 𝑠 ℎ ) = √ 𝑠(𝑥 𝑖 )𝑠(𝑥 ℎ ). Since the model specifies random link formation between active individuals, 𝑔(𝑠 𝑖 , 𝑠 ℎ ) can be also interpreted as the probability of social link formation between 𝑖 and ℎ.…”
Section: Stage 2: Formation Of Social Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%