2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.cam.2015.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Occupation times of hyper-exponential jump diffusion processes with application to price step options

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Closed-form formulas for European-style double barrier step options are obtained by Davydov & Linetsky (2002). European Step options are also studied under a class of nonlinear volatility diffusions by Campolieti, Makarov, & Wouterloot (2013) and hyper-exponential jump-diffusion processes by Wu & Zhou (2016). Xing & Yang (2013) consider American-style step options, for which the adjustment factor is based on the occupation time from the inception date to the exercise date.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Closed-form formulas for European-style double barrier step options are obtained by Davydov & Linetsky (2002). European Step options are also studied under a class of nonlinear volatility diffusions by Campolieti, Makarov, & Wouterloot (2013) and hyper-exponential jump-diffusion processes by Wu & Zhou (2016). Xing & Yang (2013) consider American-style step options, for which the adjustment factor is based on the occupation time from the inception date to the exercise date.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, after some simple calculations, we obtain that formula (3.31) will reduce to the results given by Corollary 3.9 in [18].…”
Section: Examplesmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…where we have used the following result: 2 From the proof given in the Appendix A of Wu and Zhou [18], we obtain that V…”
Section: Proof Of Proposition 41mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, assume that b ∈ R, s > 0, p > −s and −ϑ < 3 · q < η. The objection is to deduce the expression of The main results are given in Theorem 3.1, and for its derivation, we improve the approach in Wu and Zhou (2016). Especially, the technic used in proving V ′ (b−) = V ′ (b+) in Lemma 3.1 (will be presented after the proof of Theorem 3.1) is new and novel, and is expected to give some motivations to the investigation on the occupation times of Ornstein-Uhlenbeck processes driven by more general Lévy processes and other stochastic processes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%