2016
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.94.034320
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Occupation probabilities of single particle levels using the microscopic interacting boson model: Application to some nuclei of interest in neutrinoless double-βdecay

Abstract: . (2016). Occupation probabilities of single particle levels using the microscopic interacting boson model: Application to some nuclei of interest in neutrinoless double-β decay. Physical Review C, 94 (3), 034320. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.94.034320 2016 PHYSICAL REVIEW C 94, 034320 (2016) Occupation probabilities of single particle levels using the microscopic interacting boson model:Application to some nuclei of interest in neutrinoless double-β decay We have developed a new method to calculate the occupancies… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(69 reference statements)
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent work by Entwisle et al [8] measured the π0h 11/2 occupancy to be small, 0.62, about 5% of the full shell, as would be expected below the [8] and the neutron data from the present work. The three different theoretical calculations are from the shell model, SM1 [14] and SM2 [50], and the interacting boson model, IBM [51]. The discrepancy between the theoretical calculations and the experimental data is shown on the right where the error bars show the experimental uncertainty.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent work by Entwisle et al [8] measured the π0h 11/2 occupancy to be small, 0.62, about 5% of the full shell, as would be expected below the [8] and the neutron data from the present work. The three different theoretical calculations are from the shell model, SM1 [14] and SM2 [50], and the interacting boson model, IBM [51]. The discrepancy between the theoretical calculations and the experimental data is shown on the right where the error bars show the experimental uncertainty.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The single-particle energies may be considered as input parameters to be fitted to reach an optimal correspondence with the data, or alternatively they can be calculated using a mean field potential, or they can be extracted from available experimental data. In Reference [50] the single-particle and single-hole energies for protons and neutrons were extracted from experimental data and discussed in detail. The underlying motivation in [50] was to estimate the validity of the single-particle energies and check the reliability of the used IBM-2 wave functions by calculating occupancies of the appropriate singleparticle levels.…”
Section: Considered Sets Of Single-particle Energiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Reference [50] the single-particle and single-hole energies for protons and neutrons were extracted from experimental data and discussed in detail. The underlying motivation in [50] was to estimate the validity of the single-particle energies and check the reliability of the used IBM-2 wave functions by calculating occupancies of the appropriate singleparticle levels. These kinds of tests are particularly important in the case of nuclei involved in DBD, as they directly affect the evaluation of the nuclear matrix elements and thus their reliability [66].…”
Section: Considered Sets Of Single-particle Energiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations