2010
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605637
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Occupation and cancer in Britain

Abstract: Background: Prioritising control measures for occupationally related cancers should be evidence based. We estimated the current burden of cancer in Britain attributable to past occupational exposures for International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) group 1 (established) and 2A (probable) carcinogens. Methods: We calculated attributable fractions and numbers for cancer mortality and incidence using risk estimates from the literature and national data sources to est… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
152
3
8

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 191 publications
(165 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
152
3
8
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a link has been demonstrated between social class and HPV-related cancers. Data indicates that cervical cancer incidence is considerably higher among women of working age in manual than in non-manual classes (Rushton et al, 2010;Parkin, 2011). The impact of occupational exposures, together with the occupational circumstances and industrial areas where exposures to carcinogenic agents occurred in the past, on population cancer morbidity and mortality; this can be compared with the impact of other causes of cancer (Parkin, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a link has been demonstrated between social class and HPV-related cancers. Data indicates that cervical cancer incidence is considerably higher among women of working age in manual than in non-manual classes (Rushton et al, 2010;Parkin, 2011). The impact of occupational exposures, together with the occupational circumstances and industrial areas where exposures to carcinogenic agents occurred in the past, on population cancer morbidity and mortality; this can be compared with the impact of other causes of cancer (Parkin, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To account for cancer latency a risk exposure period (REP) was defined for each carcinogen as the exposure period relevant to a cancer appearing in a specific target year (10-50 years for solid tumors, 0-20 years for lymphohaematopoetic tumors). As exposure-response risk estimates and proportions exposed at different levels are not generally available, risk estimates and proportions exposed were obtained wherever possible for "high," "medium," and "low" exposure levels with a "background" level, where appropriate, assumed to have 0 excess risk [these categories have been expanded from "high" and "low" only which were used to estimate current burden (1)]. Estimated AFs were applied to total British deaths (for 2005) and registrations (for 2004) to give attributable cancer numbers.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is estimated to account for 5.3% of all diagnosed cases and 7.1% of those found in men [16]. The most important industrial chemical compounds implicated in the process of carcinogenesis include aromatic amines (e.g.…”
Section: Occupational Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%