Occupants’ satisfaction and perceived productivity in open-plan offices designed to support activity-based working: findings from different industry sectors

Abstract

Purpose In the rise of offices designed to support activity-based working (ABW), parts of industry have fully transitioned to open-plan environments and then later to unassigned seating, whereas other parts, such as tertiary education, are still in the process of moving away from individual offices. There are a few relevant studies to understand how occupants from industry sectors with different levels of adoption of ABW perceived environments designed to support this way of working. This paper aims to contribute to the knowledge gap by providing insight into workers’ satisfaction and dissatisfaction from open-plan offices designed to support ABW along with the key predictors of perceived productivity. Design/methodology/approach A data set of 2,090 post-occupancy evaluation surveys conducted in five sectors – tertiary education, finance, construction, property/asset management and design/engineering – was analyzed. ANOVA and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were conducted for the survey questionnaires. First, ANOVA tests were conducted for the whole sample with perceived productivity as the dependent variable. A seven-point Likert scale with five theoretical factors was generated with all survey questionnaires. CFA was performed to show the factor loadings. In addition, regression analyses were carried out for each of factor item taken as the independent variable, where perceived productivity was the dependent variable. Key sources of satisfaction and dissatisfaction per sector were analyzed and differences between occupants reporting a negative or positive impact on their productivity were also investigated. Finally, open-ended comments were analyzed to show the key sources of dissatisfaction based on open-ended comments. Findings Workers from construction were the most satisfied, followed by finance and tertiary education. Occupants from all industry sectors consistently rated their workspaces highly on biophilic and interior design. Distraction and privacy received the lowest scores from all sectors. Open-ended comments showed mismatches between spatial and behavioral dimensions of ABW both for satisfaction and perceived productivity. Interior design was the strongest predictor for perceived productivity for all sectors. Findings dispel the notion that ABW implementation may not be suitable for certain industries, as long as the three key pillars of ABW are fully implemented, including design, behavior and technology. Originality/value This paper provides insight into workers’ satisfaction and dissatisfaction from open-plan offices designed to support ABW in different industry sectors along with the key predictors of perceived productivity.

Learning to work from home: experience of Australian workers and organizational representatives during the first Covid-19 lockdowns

“…From the physical environment perspective, the well-known challenges around open plan working, including lack of control over the physical environment (Candido et al , 2020; Ekstrand and Damman, 2016; Candido et al , 2021), lack of visual and acoustics privacy (Brand and Smith, 2005; Bodin Danielsson and Bodin, 2009), lack of ability to perform focused work and being interrupted (Candido et al , 2019), wherein the spotlight again. The initial impression is that some of these issues were “resolved” by having people working from home with some reporting productive outcomes arising from the ability to concentrate alone (Parker, 2020).…”

A Quasi-Experimental Exploration of Activity-Based Flexible Office Design and Demographic Differences in Employee Absenteeism

“…This null finding might be due to several psychological mechanisms activated when transitioning to an A-FO. On the one hand, the feeling of decreased privacy (Brunia et al, 2016; Candido et al, 2021; Gorgievski et al, 2010) might lead to more robust withdrawal behavior. On the other hand, in the seventies, Altman (1975) suggested that autonomy, or the ability to control or regulate to maintain self-identity, would be a function of privacy.…”

Designing for COVID-2x: Reflecting on Future-Proofing Human Habitation for the Inevitable Next Pandemic

“…Open-plan offices are inherently susceptible to the spread of COVID-19 among coworkers [35], with some writers predicting the end of this concept [114,115] given underlying pre-pandemic concerns of workplace confidentiality and productivity in open plan designs [116,117]. Assuming that the concept will not fade away given perceptions by management for the need of command-and-control staff management, and a lack of opportunities for the ready modifications to internal structures [118,119], consideration needs to be given to the design of ventilation. As most activity in open plan offices is sedentary, with most staff working on workstations, speaking on the phone or via videoconferencing, air should be downwards extracted either at the desk level (akin to the ventilation in nail salons) or at the intersections and nodes of desk arrays, rather than continuing the current pattern of air dispersion through the entire space (Figure 5).…”