Occupant preferences and satisfaction with the luminous environment and control systems in daylit offices: a literature review

Abstract

/npsi/ctrl?lang=en http://nparc.cisti-icist.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/npsi/ctrl?lang=fr Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at http://nparc.cisti-icist.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/npsi/jsp/nparc_cp.jsp?lang=en NRC Publications Archive Archives des publications du CNRCThis publication could be one of several versions: author's original, accepted manuscript or the publisher's version. / La version de cette publication peut être l'une des suivantes : la version prépublication de l'auteur, la version acceptée du manuscrit ou la version de l'éditeur. For the publisher's version, please access the DOI link below./ Pour consulter la version de l'éditeur, utilisez le lien DOI ci-dessous.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild. 2006.03.001 Energy and Buildings, 38, 7, pp. 728-742, 2006-07-01 Occupant preferences and satisfaction with the luminous environment and control systems in daylit offices: a literature review Galasiu, A. D.; Veitch, J. A. AbstractThis paper presents an overview of peer-reviewed investigations of subjective issues linked to the use of daylighting in office buildings, particularly studies of preferred physical and luminous conditions in daylit office environments, and studies of occupant satisfaction and acceptance of electric lighting and window shading controls. The literature shows a consistent strong preference for daylight and a wide distribution between individuals in relation to the preferred illuminance levels in daylit offices. Existing knowledge about how people respond to daylight-linked lighting and shading controls in the workplace is very limited; therefore, this paper presents a summary of knowledge gaps in the field of daylighting and its interaction with the occupants. The resulting key directions for future research highlight issues for which a better understanding is required for the development of lighting and window shading control systems that are both energy efficient and suitable for the office occupants. Crown

Framework for assessing the performance potential of seasonally adaptable facades using multi-objective optimization

“…It is remarkable that, for most months in the year, the adaptable WWR values are larger than the static value. Larger WWR values indicate that in this case study CABS also increase the view to the outside, which is an important performance aspect in buildings [62]. As such, this finding shows a clear example of the promising role of CABS, together with the type of concessions [63] that is needed to design static building envelopes which are supposed to perform well under the wide range of different boundary conditions.…”

Individual Control over the Physical Work Environment to Affect Creativity

“…In fact as suggested by previous studies personal control over the work environment is necessary for individual well-being (Brager et al, 2004;Huang et al, 2004). Empirical studies also have indicated that the availability of choices in the physical environment will lead to better outcomes for employees, such as better performance and improved mood (Paciuk, 1990, Parker et al, 2013, Veitch and Gifford, 1996bGalasiu and Veitch, 2006). Based on the broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions, positive and good feelings change people's bodily systems and predict healthier mental and physical outcomes such as reducing stress and physical pain; it also modify people's perception and insight (Fredrickson, 2001;Fredrickson and Branigan, 2005).…”

Critical Aspects of the Inclusive Environmental for the Well-being of Building Occupant – A Review

“…Nonetheless, the good indoor environmental quality can improve overall work, learning performance and reduce absenteeism. There are numbers of paper have recently reviewed, [10] point out on the effects of single environmental conditions on human such as examiné which conditions lead to satisfaction with the visual and acoustic environment .Besides that, studies by [11] concern about which factors are not significant to the indoor environment and again they highlighted more on satisfaction with a single environmental condition such as visual environment or thermal environment [12]. Subsequently, from the research studies tended to consider environmental comfort such as temperature, velocity, radiant temperature and humidity but none have considered lighting, noise and smell.…”