Occupancy and density of a habitat specialist and a sympatric generalist songbird species in Tasmania

Abstract

Patterns of distribution and abundance of species are dependent on their particular ecological requirements. Taking specialisation into account is important for interpreting population parameters. Here, we evaluate population parameters of an endangered habitat specialist, the forty‐spotted pardalote (Pardalotus quadragintus; dependent on white gum Eucalyptus viminalis in south‐eastern Tasmania), and a sympatric congeneric habitat generalist, the striated pardalote (Pardalotus striatus). We used occupancy models to estimate occupancy of both species, and distance sampling models to estimate population density and size on North Bruny Island. Within their shared habitat (i.e. white gum forest), we also fitted hierarchical distance sampling models to estimate density in relation to fine‐scale habitat features. We show that forty‐spotted pardalotes only occurred in forests where white gums were present, with a mean density of 2.7 birds per hectare. The density of forty‐spotted pardalotes decreased in areas with abundant small trees and trees with dead crowns, but they increased in areas where larger white gums were abundant. The striated pardalote was widespread, but where white gums were present, they occurred at 2.1 birds per hectare, compared to 0.6 birds per hectare in forests where white gums were absent. Within white gum habitat, the relative abundance of forty‐spotted pardalotes and dead trees had a positive effect on the density of striated pardalotes while small trees had a negative effect. Our study reveals that although widespread, the generalist is most abundant in the limited areas of habitat suitable for the specialist, and this indicates the need of future research to look at whether this pattern of occurrence exacerbates competition in resource depleted habitats.

Modelling the distribution of a key habitat feature to guide future on‐ground habitat assessment for an endangered specialist songbird

“…We collated presence and absence records of white gum across Tasmania using data from three different sources: (1) data collected by the authors during other field surveys (Alves et al., 2019; Webb et al . 2014); (2) data made available by Sustainable Timber Tasmania (STT; presence and absence data collected at 7234 vegetation plots across Tasmania between 1990 and 2019); and (3) data downloaded from the Natural Values Atlas (http://www.naturalvaluesatlas.tas.gov.au, accessed 28 October 2019).…”