2019
DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2019.1186
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Occult Nodal Disease and Occult Extranodal Extension in Patients With Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Undergoing Primary Transoral Robotic Surgery With Neck Dissection

Abstract: IMPORTANCEThe historically reported rates of subclinical cervical nodal metastases in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) predate the emergence of human papillomavirus as the predominant causative agent. The rate of occult nodal disease with changing etiology of OPSCC is not known, and it is challenging to anticipate which patients will be upstaged postoperatively and will require adjuvant therapy.OBJECTIVE To assess the rate of nodal upstaging and occult extranodal extension (ENE) in a multi-institu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(67 reference statements)
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous analyses of national‐level data suggest unacceptably high rates of both positive surgical margins and a need for adjuvant therapy with upfront surgical approaches, and this highlights the possibility of poor surgical selection nationwide . Notably, the preoperative prediction of adequate margin control and ENE remains challenging despite advances in imaging techniques …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous analyses of national‐level data suggest unacceptably high rates of both positive surgical margins and a need for adjuvant therapy with upfront surgical approaches, and this highlights the possibility of poor surgical selection nationwide . Notably, the preoperative prediction of adequate margin control and ENE remains challenging despite advances in imaging techniques …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 Notably, the preoperative prediction of adequate margin control and ENE remains challenging despite advances in imaging techniques. 15,16 The objectives of this study were 2-fold: 1) to assess for patient-, hospital-, and disease-specific factors that influence treatment strategies across the United States and 2) to assess predictors of triple-modality therapy in those receiving upfront surgical approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, in this series 13/37 patients had ENE on final pathology the was not identified radiologically. While there remains controversy on the prognostic implication of ENE in HPV‐related OPSCC, this is an important variable that continues to guide primary and adjuvant therapy 17,27 . On the basis of the results of this study, muscle invasion is associated with many known negative prognostic findings on pathology, and therefore warrants further reporting and study to clarify its prognostic utility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Gildener-Leapman et al [ 15 ] performed a retrospective study of TORS-treated patients showing that neck dissection upstaged the nodal status in 36% of patients. McMullen et al [ 16 ] retrospectively reviewed the incidence of occult nodal disease in patients undergoing TORS with neck dissection and demonstrated that 22% of patients were pathologically upstaged from N0/N1 to N2 or greater. Our study provides some encouraging evidence of improved patient selection, with the rate of adjuvant chemoradiation dropping from over 40% in 2010 to less than 30 percent in 2016 ( Figure 4 B).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On univariate analysis, the receipt of adjuvant radiation therapy (Hazard ratio: (HR): 0.65, 95% CI: 0.48, 0.87), adjuvant chemoradiation (HR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.62, 1.07), HPV status (HR: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.24, 0.42), Charlson comorbidity score (HR: 1.56, 95% CI: 1.18, 2.0), clinical Tumor (T) stage (T3/4 vs. T1, HR: 1.75, 95% CI:1. 16 Figure 3). Figure 3).…”
Section: Survival Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%