2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-9730.2007.00416.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Occlusion‐Compensated True Orthorectification For High‐Resolution Satellite Images

Abstract: This paper describes a method to generate true ortho-images from highresolution satellite images. Multi-view images are used to compensate for hidden areas. This work includes three steps: (1) the generation of traditional ortho-images using a terrain model, (2) the relief correction for buildings, and (3) the detection of, and compensation for, hidden areas. A rational function model (RFM) is used to determine the geometric correspondence between the image space and the object space. In the generation of trad… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Among multiple object points along the same line of sight competing for a single image pixel, the point closest to the perspective centre has the minimum distance value and is judged to be visible, while the other further points are considered invisible. Some modified variants of z-buffer have been proposed to conquer its drawbacks or to extend to rectify images taken by pushbroom sensors (Amhar et al, 1998;Rau et al, 2000;Nielsen, 2004;Oda et al, 2004;Bang et al, 2007;Habib et al, 2007;Chen et al, 2007;Antequera et., 2008;Bang and Kim, 2010).…”
Section: Visibility Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Among multiple object points along the same line of sight competing for a single image pixel, the point closest to the perspective centre has the minimum distance value and is judged to be visible, while the other further points are considered invisible. Some modified variants of z-buffer have been proposed to conquer its drawbacks or to extend to rectify images taken by pushbroom sensors (Amhar et al, 1998;Rau et al, 2000;Nielsen, 2004;Oda et al, 2004;Bang et al, 2007;Habib et al, 2007;Chen et al, 2007;Antequera et., 2008;Bang and Kim, 2010).…”
Section: Visibility Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Binary tree ray tracing (Nielsen, 2004) 3D TIN Extra storage for indexing Triangle sorting (Oda et al, 2004;Karras et al, 2007;Barazzetti et al, 2014) Hybrid 2D/3D TINs Prone to sorting errors Polygon (Kuzmin et al, 2004;Chen et al, 2007) Resolution independent, less memory False visible polygons Table 1. Visibility analysis methods However, these approaches require using different algorithms to locate the perspective centres and/or nadir points for different imaging sensors, and also assume that the imaging ray from the ground surface to the sensor is a straight line.…”
Section: Intersect Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, both polynomials are the functions of ground coordinates. Therefore, the RPC model is for further generalization for polynomial model and linear transform model and it is suitable for different types of sensors [8,12]. In the RPC rectification model, the image coordinates are the ratio of two polynomials in which the three-dimensional coordinates of GCPs are set as independent variables as follows in Equation (2) [2,15,20,25,27,29,30]:…”
Section: Rpc Rectification Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the spline function is established for these points respectively to calculate the correct value and obtain local geometric corrected coordinates point-by-point, so as to improve the accuracy of image orthorectification [19]. Essentially, local geometric correction is used to transform physical coordinates to user coordinates so that the spatial information of ArcGIS database has a practical significance [2,25]. Finally, based on the tested results, the proposed procedure was evaluated and relevant issues were discussed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%