2017
DOI: 10.11607/ijp.5216
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Occlusal Support and Temporomandibular Disorders Among Elderly Vietnamese

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
19
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The current study highlighted a different dental status between the TMD elderly and non-TMD elderly groups. Our TMD elderly group lost an average of 9.6 ± 8.6 teeth and were higher than the non-TMD group; in other words, our study was in accordance with previous findings indicating that there was association of TMD with missing teeth [16][17][18]. When individuals lose many teeth, their chewing pattern can be changed and have impact on masticatory performance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The current study highlighted a different dental status between the TMD elderly and non-TMD elderly groups. Our TMD elderly group lost an average of 9.6 ± 8.6 teeth and were higher than the non-TMD group; in other words, our study was in accordance with previous findings indicating that there was association of TMD with missing teeth [16][17][18]. When individuals lose many teeth, their chewing pattern can be changed and have impact on masticatory performance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Schmitter et al 9 confirmed that non-occlusion on at least one side accelerated myofascial pain 4.2 times more than having occlusal contacts on both sides. Supporting the study of Schmitter et al, 9 findings from our previous study 20 reported that the total loss of unilateral occlusal support increased the risk of TMDs 3.4 times. Moreover, TMJ sounds were reported more often in individuals with unilateral posterior support.…”
Section: Total Loss Of Unilateral Occlusal Support Seems To Be An Aet...supporting
confidence: 79%
“…17,18,20 Using Eichner's classification, the highest prevalence of class C (no occlusal support) was found in 77.2% of individuals having TMJ dysfunction, 38 followed by 23.8-32.4% of muscle and TMJ tenderness, 41 20.3% of limited mouth opening 32 and 19.3% of TMD diagnoses. 20 Regarding the methods of statistical analysis, five studies used logistic regression to determine TMD risk due to loss of teeth and occlusal support. Three case-control studies indicated an association between loss of posterior teeth and TMDs (odds ratio (OR) range 2.0-3.7).…”
Section: Study Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sobre la pérdida de cinco o más dientes en sector posterior, el 52,27 % de los pacientes con TTM evaluados, presentaban este factor al menos en una arcada o bimaxilar. Al respecto, Son Nguyen et al (2017) realizaron un estudio para analizar la asociación entre la ausencia de dientes, soporte oclusal y TTM; llegando a la conclusión que la pérdida del soporte oclusal en uno o ambos lados del arco dental debido a la falta de dientes posteriores eran factores de riesgo de TTM. En referencia al patrón oclusal, en el presente trabajó se encontró que el 43,94 % de los participantes presentaban el patrón oclusal Clase II; sobre ello, Fichera et al (2021) en base a los resultados de su estudio, argumentan que la Clase II esqueletal es un factor predisponente a la aparición de TTM, atribuyendo también la reducción de la estabilidad ortopédica maxilo mandibular.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified