2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.sdj.2017.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

​Occlusal characteristics and ethnic variations in Malaysian orthodontic patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, Yuen et al (18) and Ling and Wong (19) suggested that in the Asian population, the mesiodistal width of the mandibular anterior teeth is larger compared to the Caucasians. A higher Bolton's value obtained in some studies conducted in the Malaysian population coincides with the finding of crowding in our study (13). However, contrasting reports were found in a study conducted on Lithuanian schoolchildren where crowding was found to be more in the maxilla (44.1%) in comparison to the mandible (40.3%) (20).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further, Yuen et al (18) and Ling and Wong (19) suggested that in the Asian population, the mesiodistal width of the mandibular anterior teeth is larger compared to the Caucasians. A higher Bolton's value obtained in some studies conducted in the Malaysian population coincides with the finding of crowding in our study (13). However, contrasting reports were found in a study conducted on Lithuanian schoolchildren where crowding was found to be more in the maxilla (44.1%) in comparison to the mandible (40.3%) (20).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Crowding and spacing in the dental arch are two of the common causes of malocclusion for which individuals seek orthodontic treatment. The prevalence of crowding and spacing varies according to differences in population across the world, and knowledge of this provides valuable insight into the treatment of malocclusion in line with the standard cephalometric norms of that population (13). In our study, crowding was a feature more common in the mandibular arch in our study population, which comprised 80% of the study population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…In this study, the prevalence of Class I skeletal pattern was 41.3%, Class II: 46.1%, and Class III: 12.6%. Based on the literature reviews, the prevalence of Class I malocclusion in the Malay population was reported to be in the range of 33.3% to 39.3%, Class II: 12% to 30%, and Class III: 12.2% to 48.7% (6)(7)(8). The large variation between different studies was due to different sampling methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This type of sampling was why the prevalence of Class I skeletal pattern was lower in this study which used the same convenience sampling method by recruiting only potential orthodontic patients from clinic settings. However, it was worth noticing that while the previous studies aforementioned had investigated the prevalence of malocclusion of the Malaysian and the Malay population, all had used Angle's Classification to classify the occlusal status of the population, meaning that the prevalence represented more of the dental origin rather than the underlying skeletal pattern (6). Therefore, only a little comparison could be made with these studies due to different categorisation methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation