2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2006.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Occluding the trajectory of an object: Effects on predicting containment with 9-, 12- and 16-month-olds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings highlight the significance of exploratory activities such as looking and event information to support infants' perception of containment. They also add to results from our earlier studies (Dejonckheere et al, 2005, 2006, 2007), which together suggest two interrelated processes that develop with age. The first concerns the process of discriminating different outcomes on the basis of the topology that arises for the objects when they interact and that distinguishes different outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The findings highlight the significance of exploratory activities such as looking and event information to support infants' perception of containment. They also add to results from our earlier studies (Dejonckheere et al, 2005, 2006, 2007), which together suggest two interrelated processes that develop with age. The first concerns the process of discriminating different outcomes on the basis of the topology that arises for the objects when they interact and that distinguishes different outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…When the experimenters showed the descent of the object into a too narrow container and occluded the passing-through episode from sight, only 16-month-old infants, and not younger infants, showed longer looking times. In a final study (Dejonckheere et al, 2007), a screen hid part of the trajectory but left the last 2, 5, or 16 cm above the container rim free for visual inspection. Longer looking times were found for end states that were inconsistent with the relative width of the objects, compared with states that were consistent with the relative width in tests with younger infants.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In developmental research, learning by infants in non-social situations has been frequently explained by what aspects of the task or the task materials infants need to understand in order to produce a certain goal (e.g. Dejonckheere, Smitsman, & Verhofstadt-Denève, 2007;Huang & Charman, 2005;Thelen, Schöner, Scheier, & Smith, 2001). Conversely, superior learning outcomes in social settings are usually explained in terms of what infants understand of the (social) behavior of others (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our view, there are many ways in which attention can be attuned to critical features of the environment from which affordances can be learned. These can be social such as pointing and gaze (de Bordes et al, 2013;Goldin-Meadow, 2007), non-social such as handling or dropping an object (Fritz et al, 2000;Zentall, 2001), and inanimate such as mechanical movements (Dejonckheere et al, 2007) or animations (Grant & Spivey, 2003). In natural social situations, infants ranging between 12 and 18 months of age tend to look at the hand movements and the gaze of the caregiver from which they can learn about what the caregiver is doing and more general leads to joint attention (Yu & Smith, 2013, 2017.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our view, there are many ways in which attention can be attuned to critical features of the environment from which affordances can be learned. These can be social such as pointing and gaze (de Bordes et al, 2013;Goldin-Meadow, 2007), non-social such as handling or dropping an object (Fritz et al, 2000;Zentall, 2001), and inanimate such as mechanical movements (Dejonckheere et al, 2007) or animations (Grant & Spivey, 2003). In natural social situations, infants ranging between 12 and 18 months of age tend to look at the hand movements and the gaze of the caregiver from which they can learn about what the caregiver is doing and more general leads to joint attention (Yu & Smith, 2013, 2017.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%