2008
DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2006.111989
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Occluding the left atrial appendage: anatomical considerations

Abstract: The LAA orifice is oval shaped and thin areas of appendage wall and atrial wall are common. Potentially, the left superior pulmonary vein, mitral valve and anterior descending coronary artery can be at risk during occlusion of the os.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
109
0
5

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 150 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
109
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…It comprises a single layer of endothelium and is trabeculated with underlying pectinate muscles lining the cavity. The LAA varies considerably in size from 16-51mm in length, 10-40mm in diameter and 0.77-19.27cm 3 in volume [5,6]. The LAA also appears to differ in morphology with distinct variants including the 'chicken wing', 'cactus', 'windsock' and 'cauliflower' being described in 48%, 30%, 19% and 3% of cases respectively [7].…”
Section: Laa Anatomymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It comprises a single layer of endothelium and is trabeculated with underlying pectinate muscles lining the cavity. The LAA varies considerably in size from 16-51mm in length, 10-40mm in diameter and 0.77-19.27cm 3 in volume [5,6]. The LAA also appears to differ in morphology with distinct variants including the 'chicken wing', 'cactus', 'windsock' and 'cauliflower' being described in 48%, 30%, 19% and 3% of cases respectively [7].…”
Section: Laa Anatomymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The depth is measured in the main lobe of the LAA. The shape of the LAA ostium is typically elliptical; other shapes have been less frequently described [13,15]. Markedly oval-shaped orifices or landing zones are associated with a significant difference between maximal and minimal diameters, which can be confounding and may lead to overor under-sizing.…”
Section: International Journal Of Cardiovascular Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ranges and frequencies of orientation were similar between sexes, with a slightly higher frequency of retroverted LAAs in women (16%) than in men (6%), device design and procedural technique. As the thin walls of the LAA (muscular wall ≤1 mm) are vulnerable, device maneuvering during the procedure [18] together with anatomical variation in the LAA may partly explain the most common (4-5%) [5,6] risk of perforation and pericardial hemorrhage. Malalignment of the delivery system with the central axis of the LAA may cause tension/stress on the LAA or may result in suboptimal device positioning, leading to more manipulations including device recapturing and redeployment.…”
Section: Orientation/angulationmentioning
confidence: 99%