2016
DOI: 10.4172/2165-7920.1000881
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Occipital Fracture or Mendosal Suture?:Case Report

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because we did not extend our investigation past 18 months, it is conceivable that a minor percentage of subjects beyond this age could exhibit some lateral patency. These remaining regions of mendosal patency can usually be distinguished from non-accidental cranial fractures because they usually are noncontiguous and bilateral, 13 , 29 and unaccompanied by other findings seen in cranial trauma such as intracranial and retinal hemorrhage. 4 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because we did not extend our investigation past 18 months, it is conceivable that a minor percentage of subjects beyond this age could exhibit some lateral patency. These remaining regions of mendosal patency can usually be distinguished from non-accidental cranial fractures because they usually are noncontiguous and bilateral, 13 , 29 and unaccompanied by other findings seen in cranial trauma such as intracranial and retinal hemorrhage. 4 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because we did not extend our investigation past 18 months, it is conceivable that a minor percentage of subjects beyond this age could exhibit some lateral patency. These remaining regions of mendosal patency can usually be distinguished from non-accidental cranial fractures because they usually are noncontiguous and bilateral, 13,29 and unaccompanied by other findings seen in cranial trauma such as intracranial and retinal hemorrhage. 4 Cranial shape analysis confirmed that subjects with persistent mendosal patency indeed demonstrated increased projection (bathrocephaly) relative to an unaffected parietal landmark, and this was not observed in the control cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%