2018
DOI: 10.2459/01.jcm.0000549892.25617.2d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oc59 Prevalence and Clinical Impact of Systemic Inflammatory Reaction After Cardiac Surgery

Abstract: Background and Aim: The inflammatory reaction associated with cardiac surgery has been widely studied by means of laboratory biomarkers but rarely from a clinical perspective. Many anti-inflammatory treatments have failed to show clinical benefits. In 1992 the ACCP/SCCM conference defined the SIRS (table 1). Our aim is to verify the prevalence of clinically defined SIRS following heart surgery, to identify its predisposing factors and ascertain its impact on early outcome. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Morbidity and mortality are increased in patients developing SIRS after cardiac surgery [7]. The prevalence of SIRS after cardiac surgery varies according to the criteria defined for its diagnosis and is reported between 12% and 59% [7,8]. In our setting, prevalence was 38%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Morbidity and mortality are increased in patients developing SIRS after cardiac surgery [7]. The prevalence of SIRS after cardiac surgery varies according to the criteria defined for its diagnosis and is reported between 12% and 59% [7,8]. In our setting, prevalence was 38%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted January 23, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.01.20.22269116 doi: medRxiv preprint varies according to the criteria defined for its diagnosis and is reported between 12% and 59% [7,8]. In our setting, prevalence was 38%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation