2012
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(12)70474-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oc-0135 Can Patient Reported Outcome Measures Replace Clinical Assessments in Breast Radiotherapy Trials?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most have suggested that patients rate their treatment toxicity outcome more positively as compared with clinicians. Conversely, the large multi-centre START trial suggested that patients score their treatment toxicity more severely as compared with clinicians [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most have suggested that patients rate their treatment toxicity outcome more positively as compared with clinicians. Conversely, the large multi-centre START trial suggested that patients score their treatment toxicity more severely as compared with clinicians [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite this, PROMs may still be very useful in detecting differences between treatment arms, as illustrated in the START trial. Haviland et al [14] showed that PROMs are sensitive enough to distinguish changes in normal tissue toxicity between different whole breast radiotherapy fractionation arms. By comparison, PROMs did not show a significant reduction in normal tissue toxicity due to IMRT in the Cambridge breast IMRT trial.…”
Section: Limitations Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%