2003
DOI: 10.1080/13102818.2003.10817058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Obtaining Plants using in Vitro Micrografting Method in Some Grapevine Varieties (Vitis ViniferaL)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, superior cultivar on both Ramey and Dog Ridge showed the same trend. (52) reported that the highest grafting success rate was obtained from Early Cardinal cultivar grafted on 41B followed by Early Cardinal on Ramsey with the rate of 71.4%. Many researchers found that micrografting success varies with the rootstocks because of the compatibility reaction between the grafting partners.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, superior cultivar on both Ramey and Dog Ridge showed the same trend. (52) reported that the highest grafting success rate was obtained from Early Cardinal cultivar grafted on 41B followed by Early Cardinal on Ramsey with the rate of 71.4%. Many researchers found that micrografting success varies with the rootstocks because of the compatibility reaction between the grafting partners.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(44) reported that root number and root length of Stevia rebaudiana plant cultures were significantly influenced by the strength of MS medium (25%MS, 50% MS and full strength MS). Several researchers in the tissue culture of grapes used MS medium (52,1,49). (35) reported that rooting 'Marechal Foch'grapevine in half-strength MS salts was superior to rooting in full-strength MS salts.…”
Section: Effect Of Iba Concentration On Grafting Successmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This problem has been overcome through the use of micrografting which is done under controlled environmental conditions throughout the year and production can be planned according to market demand. Micrografting has particular utility in fruit tree production and protocol have been developed in many fruit crops including almond (Yıldırım et al, 2013;Isıkalan et al, 2011), apple (Huang and Millikan, 1980), apricot (Piagnani et al, 2006), avocado (Simon and Richard, 2005), cashew (Mneney and Mantell, 2001), cherry (Amiri, 2006(Amiri, , 2007, grapes (Tangolar et al, 2003;Aazami and Bagher, 2010), pear (Faggioli et al, 1997), pistachio (Abousalim and Mantell, 1992), walnut (Wang et al, 2010), etc. For commercialization of micrografting, protocol should be perfect to give higher percentage of successful micrografts.…”
Section: Grafting Success During Micrograftingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evaluating the rootstocks for higher graft success with a particular scion will definitely help in commercializing micrografting technique for mass multiplication of fruit crops. Tangolar et al (2003) studied micrografting success in two cultivars of grape (Early Cardinal and Yalova incisi) when grafted on four different rootstocks (Dogridge, Salt Creek, 1613 C and 41 B) and reported different rates of graft success which varied from 26.1% (Yalova incise on 1613 C)) to 80% (Early Cardinal on 41 B).…”
Section: Suitability Of Rootstockmentioning
confidence: 99%