Obtaining Cooperation from Sudan -- Where is the Law?

Sluiter, Göran

doi:10.1093/jicj/mqn067

Cited by 23 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…57 Sluiter has questioned the Prosecutor's delay in informing the Pre-Trial Chamber of Sudan's failure to cooperate with the Court's investigations in Darfur, given that instances of non-cooperation occurred prior to the issuance of the Court's arrest warrants and that Sudan had 'always openly expressed its dissatisfaction with the Court and its intention not to cooperate'. 58 The Prosecutor's approach prevented the Pre-Trial Chamber from formally notifying the UNSC of Sudan's non-compliance in a timely manner. 59 In relation to the Situation in Kenya, the Prosecutor has, again, been reprimanded for failing to react quickly enough to non-compliance with the Court's requests for cooperation.…”

Section: B Efficiency In Responding To Instances Of Non-cooperationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Non-cooperation and the Efficiency of the International Criminal Court

Jones¹

2016

Cooperation and the International Criminal Court

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Use policyThe full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-pro t purposes provided that:• a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.Please consult the full DRO policy for further details.

show abstract

Section: B Efficiency In Responding To Instances Of Non-cooperationmentioning

confidence: 99%