“…Then, they prove that equivalence classes of split extensions bijectively correspond to equivalence classes of actions of H on G (where an action of H on G is defined as a monoidal functor H → Eq(G), Eq(G) being the categorical group of monoidal autoequivalences of G). The quoted paper [15] is one of a series of papers devoted to extensions and derivations in the context of categorical groups, see [6,7,8,9,10,11,12], [15,16,17,18], [23]; these papers contain a number of examples showing that categorical groups provide a unifying framework for studying classical homological algebra. Despite its interest, the paper [15] suffers from a mixture of one-dimensional and two-dimensional arguments, and the aim of this note is to put some of the results by Garzón and Inassaridze into their proper 2-categorical context.…”