2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2009.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Obstetric epidural catheter-related infections at a major teaching hospital: a retrospective case series

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rates of 0.8% to 6% of overt infections of the skin at the epidural insertion site have been reported after a few days of catheterization. 18 This observation is consistent with the fact that when epidural catheters are kept in for a longer duration the risk of deep tissue infection is increased. 19,20 Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus, a part of normal skin flora, was the most common microorganism found in our study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Rates of 0.8% to 6% of overt infections of the skin at the epidural insertion site have been reported after a few days of catheterization. 18 This observation is consistent with the fact that when epidural catheters are kept in for a longer duration the risk of deep tissue infection is increased. 19,20 Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus, a part of normal skin flora, was the most common microorganism found in our study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Patients undergoing neuraxial anesthesia are at risk for infections that can lead to complications such as arachnoiditis, epidural abscess, meningitis, sepsis, cardiac arrest, or death 1‐7 . Infectious complications are known to cause serious and devastating morbidity and mortality; however, until recently, anesthesia professionals believed these complications to be rare in patients receiving neuraxial anesthesia 1‐7 . In the past 10 years, new studies have shown a higher incidence of infectious complications associated with neuraxial anesthesia than were previously reported 8,9 …”
Section: Population Intervention Comparison Outcome (Pico) Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sources of contamination include poor aseptic technique and bacterial migration along an epidural catheter track to deeper tissues 10,11 . Other sources of infection include contaminated prep or local solutions, disconnection and subsequent contamination of epidural catheters and catheter caps, and contamination from a patient's own microbial flora resulting from substandard use of antiseptic prep solutions 4 . Despite the increased experience and skill levels of anesthesia professionals who perform epidural anesthesia, Friedman et al 11 found a nonsignificant correlation between infection and the practitioner's aseptic technique.…”
Section: Population Intervention Comparison Outcome (Pico) Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations