Obstacles to the Implementation of an Integrated National Alcohol Policy in Ireland: Nannies, Neo-Liberals and Joined-Up Government

Abstract

This article explores how proponents of a public health model of alcohol policy have, for more than a quarter of a century, argued consistently but unsuccessfully for an integrated national alcohol policy in the Republic of Ireland. It looks in particular at the past decade, a time when increases in alcohol consumption and related problems strengthened the case for such an integrated policy, and when managerial innovations in the sphere of cross-cutting management appeared to provide a template for its implementation. A number of explanations are offered for the refusal of successive governments to respond to what its advocates see as the only rational, evidence-based approach to the prevention of alcohol problems. It is argued that, unlike the Nordic countries, the political culture of independent Ireland has never been one in which the state could unilaterally impose strict alcohol control policies as a feature of its broader vision of the welfare state. It is also argued that during the recent period of economic prosperity (the so-called 'Celtic Tiger' era) the country was characterised by a neo-liberal policy climate, which was specifically antipathetic to the idea that the state should interfere directly in the alcohol market with a view to preventing related problems. It is suggested that the social partnership model of governance, to which many people attributed the country's economic success, created an atmosphere of consensualism within which the state as mediator between the two main protagonists (the public health lobby and the drinks industry) was unwilling to challenge the drinks industry. It is also concluded that this failure to create a national alcohol policy based on public health principles demonstrates the limitations of the cross-cutting, or 'joined-up', approach to public management in those areas of social policy characterised by clashing value systems or fundamental conflicts of economic interest. Finally, it is acknowledged that in Ireland, as elsewhere, neo-liberal certitudes have been effectively dethroned by the economic recession and banking crisis of late 2008; whether these more straitened economic circumstances will provide a better fit for the 'nanny state' ideals of the public health perspective on alcohol remains to be seen.

Media Coverage of Alcohol Issues: A Critical Political Economy Framework—A Case Study from Ireland

“…However, since then, the government has moved very slowly on the Bill, pressurised by the drinks industry lobby and many political officials opposed to public health legislation [31]. This has been a recurring pattern in recent decades, as Ireland’s neoliberal political and economic establishment has successfully resisted the implementation of public health legislation [32,33,34,35,36]. Indeed, only in 2015 was the Bill’s general scheme finally published, but it may never be enacted [37].…”

The Possible Experts: How Epistemic Communities Negotiate Barriers to Knowledge Use in Ecosystems Services Policy

“…Rather, exogenous shocks are required to trigger a paradigm shift. Butler (2009) suggests that the economic recession triggered by the 2008 banking crisis could precipitate a move from hierarchy toward more epistemic learning in this case. …”

Tackling Public Health Challenge through Policy: Alcohol Consumption and Related Harm in UK

“…Hawkins [23] claims that alcohol related harm policies have failed implementations in the UK. Government seem to have concluded that people in the UK are aware of the side effects of drinking by emphasizing that in the sovereign nation citizens choose what is better for their own health and wellbeing [20]. It is obvious that policy advocates of public health practitioners differ from those of industry actors [24].…”