2022
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-98260-7_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Obstacle Detection in Real and Synthetic Harbour Scenarios

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the target was acquired and tracked with the perceptive system, comparing LiDAR and Camera results with the available ground truth value. Results are reported in Figures 13,14,15. In particular, Figure 13 shows the trajectory of the centroids evaluated with the camera (red markers) and with the LiDAR (blue markers). Figure 14 shows the error against the ground truth value on the x coordinates; finally, the same results are presented in a box plot in Figure 15.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, the target was acquired and tracked with the perceptive system, comparing LiDAR and Camera results with the available ground truth value. Results are reported in Figures 13,14,15. In particular, Figure 13 shows the trajectory of the centroids evaluated with the camera (red markers) and with the LiDAR (blue markers). Figure 14 shows the error against the ground truth value on the x coordinates; finally, the same results are presented in a box plot in Figure 15.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these reasons, the cloud points exceeding the spatial limits of the test pool are filtered out. Moreover, considering the point position and intensity, additional noise filters were imposed to compensate for water acquisition errors, as presented in [13,14].…”
Section: Noise Filtering and Point-cloud Cuttingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The potential of artificial intelligence in maritime navigation is well founded, both for object detection (Prasad et al, 2017) (Shao et al, 2018) (Kim et al, 2018) (Faggioni et al, 2022) and for trajectory prediction Tang et al (2022). The application of a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) for object detection is further explored in this implementation.…”
Section: Perceptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Infact, the use of a heterogeneous number of sensors with different peculiarities and measurement ranges allows the effectiveness of the system to be extended to broader scenarios, covering and balancing the shortcomings of individual sensors. A method for dealing with obstacle detection in LiDAR and cameras is proposed in (Faggioni et al, 2022).Figure 1 shows a possible application of the discussed procedure in a multi-sensor data fusion perceptive system. In paritcular, obstacles are detected in the LiDAR point cloud and the acquired targets are tracked by adopting a low computational customized method, instead of the probabilistic approaches generally employed (Ruud et al, 2018) (Lee et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%